Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Pricing
Epicor CMS
Infor VISUAL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor CMS
Infor VISUAL
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Epicor CMS
Infor VISUAL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
API for custom integration
10.02 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Single sign-on capability
10.02 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
10.02 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.3
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Dashboards
10.01 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standard reports
9.02 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Custom reports
9.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.5
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable
10.02 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Accounts receivable
10.02 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.02 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.02 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
10.02 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Standardized Processes
10.02 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.02 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.02 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Location management
10.02 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.4
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Pricing
10.02 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Credit card processing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
10.02 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Order Orchestration
8.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Billing Management
10.02 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
10.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
10.02 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Period Close
10.02 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.4
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
7.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
1 Ratings
34% above category average
Infor VISUAL
3.0
1 Ratings
81% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
2 Ratings
21% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
7.3
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Control Management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.8
1 Ratings
23% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
8.7
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Production Process Design
10.02 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Production Management
8.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.02 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Work Execution
8.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.02 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Feature
Epicor CMS
10.0
2 Ratings
31% above category average
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Forecasting
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
10.02 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Epicor CMS and Infor VISUAL
Through daily use of Epicor, it is apparent that at it's basest level, it favors a stock-based manufacturing model (your company has established SKUs and Production works to replenish stock levels when a KANBAN or other system triggers a re-order point). While it excels at that, ours is a custom-order industrial manufacturing model (we produce to customer specification or repeat orders), meaning there is no stocking of finished components, only the materials it takes to make them. It's taken some finesse (and the purchase of additional modules) to get to where we need to be.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Epicor CMS had a UI that was deemed more aesthetically pleasing than (subjective, naturally!) Sage, for which we attended a presentation/orientation session. Our Team felt Epicor (once outfitted with the necessary add-ons) would be better suited in the long run for longevity and ongoing support (especially considering our outgoing software was Sage).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Epicor has necessitated dedicated "Staging" personnel, as multi-line orders are generated as individual orders to Production/Manufacturing, meaning someone must ensure they all come together upon completion prior to shipping.
Payroll and Accounts Payable/Receivable have noted improved integration and tracking compared to the legacy/outgoing software (Business Vision).
Inventory tracking is vastly improved over the outgoing software, with detailed reports/tracking of remnant/off-cut materials, which benefits Material Handlers as well as the Purchasing Manager for keeping the inventory budget in line with targets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info