ESO Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a web-based patient care documentation and reference system for emergency medical responders and firefighters. It's designed to provide easy access to information about patients' medications, allergies, history, etc. from a tablet while in the field, and allow healthcare providers to document patient encounters quickly.
N/A
Tebra EHR
Score1 out of 10
N/A
Tebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.
$150
per provider/per month
Pricing
ESO EHR
Tebra EHR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
$150
per provider/per month
Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
$300
per provider/per month
Kareo Billing Services
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ESO EHR
Tebra EHR
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ESO EHR
Tebra EHR
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.3
1 Ratings
13% below category average
Tebra EHR
2.2
5 Ratings
106% below category average
Charting / document management
10.01 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Templates
10.01 Ratings
2.04 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fax integration
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow automation
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
1.01 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Patient portal
00 Ratings
1.05 Ratings
Speech recognition
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
E-prescribing
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
9.5
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Tebra EHR
8.0
5 Ratings
4% below category average
HIPAA compliance
10.01 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.0
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Tebra EHR
-
Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
-
Ratings
Tebra EHR
4.0
5 Ratings
61% below category average
Real-time eligibility verification
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Claims management
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Coding
00 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
For most EMS providers, ESO EHR is an ideal solution: It meets 95% of the needs for the typical EMS provider, provides an unparalleled ease of use for field personnel documenting patient care, and is easy to implement and administer. Large EMS systems should carefully consider the limitations of the underdeveloped quality management modules for QA/QI programs. Large or progressive EMS systems with an advanced data analytics/data science capability should be aware of the significant challenges and limitations ESO EHR poses for data use outside of the standard analytics reports.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The biggest gap is that doing QA/QI is not scalable or streamlined for a large provider. Managing an effective QA/QI program takes an incredible amount of labor and extra work.
The lack of customization and custom fields heavily limits use of ESO EHR to capture new data points for internal quality improvement or research projects.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ESO EHR won out due to ease of use for providers and for administration. Other vendors had greater ability to do data analysis, quality management, and customization but ultimately were significantly more difficult to learn, use, and administer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info