TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ESO EHR

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AESO Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a web-based patient care documentation and reference system for emergency medical responders and firefighters. It's designed to provide easy access to information about patients' medications, allergies, history, etc. from a tablet while in the field, and allow healthcare providers to document patient encounters quickly.N/A

    Tebra EHR

    Score1 out of 10
    N/ATebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.

    $150

    per provider/per month

    Pricing
    ESO EHRTebra EHR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
    $150
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
    $300
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Billing Services
    Contact sales team
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ESO EHRTebra EHR
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    ESO EHRTebra EHR
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    ESO Electronic Health Record
    6.3
    1 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    2.2
    5 Ratings
    106% below category average
    Charting / document management10.01 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Templates10.01 Ratings2.04 Ratings
    Mobile/tablet support10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fax integration5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with other EMR and PM systems7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow automation1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization1.01 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Patient portal00 Ratings1.05 Ratings
    Speech recognition00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    E-prescribing00 Ratings1.03 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    ESO Electronic Health Record
    9.5
    1 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Tebra EHR
    8.0
    5 Ratings
    4% below category average
    HIPAA compliance10.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Role-based permission levels8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data backups and redundancy10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Local mode / networking failsafe10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow and Scale
    Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    ESO Electronic Health Record
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    ESO Electronic Health Record
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    4.0
    5 Ratings
    61% below category average
    Real-time eligibility verification00 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Claims management00 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Coding00 Ratings4.05 Ratings
    Patient Scheduling
    Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of ESO Electronic Health Record and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    ESO Electronic Health Record
    -
    Ratings
    Tebra EHR
    1.0
    4 Ratings
    154% below category average
    Calendar interface00 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ESO EHRTebra EHR
    Small Businesses
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ESO EHRTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ESO EHRTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    ESO Solutions
    For most EMS providers, ESO EHR is an ideal solution: It meets 95% of the needs for the typical EMS provider, provides an unparalleled ease of use for field personnel documenting patient care, and is easy to implement and administer. Large EMS systems should carefully consider the limitations of the underdeveloped quality management modules for QA/QI programs. Large or progressive EMS systems with an advanced data analytics/data science capability should be aware of the significant challenges and limitations ESO EHR poses for data use outside of the standard analytics reports.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
    Read full review
    Pros
    ESO Solutions
    • Exceptional user interface/user experience design that is intuitive and easy to use.
    • ESO, as a company, is deeply integrated into the EMS industry and recognizes customer needs better than competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Catching missing patient info
    • Catching missing insurance info
    • Providing mailing addresses
    Read full review
    Cons
    ESO Solutions
    • The biggest gap is that doing QA/QI is not scalable or streamlined for a large provider. Managing an effective QA/QI program takes an incredible amount of labor and extra work.
    • The lack of customization and custom fields heavily limits use of ESO EHR to capture new data points for internal quality improvement or research projects.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Everything created can always use adjusting depending on the situation
    • Adapting to client needs quicker
    • Problems are not reported in a timely manner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    ESO Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Tebra
    Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
    Read full review
    Usability
    ESO Solutions
    No answers on this topic
    Tebra
    The user interface is fine but it the app constantly freezes or crashes.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    ESO Solutions
    Customer support has been spectacular: Personalized, rapidly available, and very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    ESO Solutions
    ESO EHR won out due to ease of use for providers and for administration. Other vendors had greater ability to do data analysis, quality management, and customization but ultimately were significantly more difficult to learn, use, and administer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    ESO Solutions
    • The ease of use for providers to complete documentation has had a very positive ROI.
    • The ease of administering the software has saved significant money and delivered very positive ROI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
    • I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
    • Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
    • You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots