F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. FatPipe MPVPN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
F5 Networks provides BIG-IP Access Policy Manager as an identity and access solution which can be deployed as a standalone solution or as an add-on to F5 Networks' flagship BIG-IP TLM or F5 Advanced WAF applications.N/A
FatPipe MPVPN
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
FatPipe MPVPN ffom FatPipe Networks in Salt Lake City aggregates two or more data lines of any type and in any combination to provide security, redundancy, and speed for VPNs. FatPipe MPVPN enables fault tolerance and reliability for VPN using technology to keep mission-critical VPNs up and running.N/A
Pricing
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Features
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Virtual Private Network
Comparison of Virtual Private Network features of Product A and Product B
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
7.7
11 Ratings
13% below category average
FatPipe MPVPN
-
Ratings
AES 256-bit Encryption8.77 Ratings00 Ratings
Kill Switch7.36 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Platform Support7.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Split Tunneling8.24 Ratings00 Ratings
IP Address Masking7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
No-Logs Policy6.26 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Server Locations6.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Wi-Fi Protection9.11 Ratings00 Ratings
Simultaneous Connections7.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Support Services7.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Small Businesses
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.2 out of 10
Norton 360
Norton 360
Score 7.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(18 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)FatPipe MPVPN
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
I think that the platform is well suited to many Remote Access VPN solutions, but I also think there is a lot of room for improvement on the backend. If you are hoping to deploy your APM solution across many different datacenters or colos, it may not be the best choice for the final solution.
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
If you need multiple ISPs for wan aggregation or site to site failover. This box can tolerate failures of ISPs and sites with less than 1-3 seconds of outage time.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • SAML 2.0 identity federation support.
  • Integrates with third-party SSO solutions.
  • Bridging modern authentication and authorization (SAML, OAuth/OIDC) and classic authentication and authorization methods.
  • Policy routing
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
  • Load balancing of ISPs
  • Site to site failover
  • SmartDNS
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • There's some more advanced configurations within OAuth that I think could be fleshed out and easier to approach.
  • There's a lot of things in F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager policies that I find myself recreating every policy. An easier way to copy objects from one to policy to another.
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
  • Could use a training manual.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
F5
Integration with F5 BIG-IP systems that we plan to keep using for a while.
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
No answers on this topic
Usability
F5
Once things are set up, it is nice and easy to get the Edge Client running on user's PCs. However, that setup process can be a bit daunting at first using the Policy Manager, and reviewing session logs can be difficult at first if you aren't 100% sure of what you're looking for.
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
F5
It is open platform so support is not good and than F5 and features visibility as not good as F5. F5 Set up and easy to use to admin console. Also have more feature visibility for load balancing, web server accelerator, application server ddos protection and WAF. F5 more efficient to handle concurrent request.
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
Fatpipe invented SD-WAN over 25 years ago and has been leading the way. Other companies I think have just ridden their coattails.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • Single sign on is great for students and faculty and staff
  • Users don't have to log in multiple times
  • Users don't need to remember multiple login IDs and passwords
  • Multi Domain SSO support bridges many internal and external facing products with single sign on
Read full review
FatPipe Networks
  • We have lost ISPs without any business disconnections.
  • Business continuity at its best.
Read full review
ScreenShots