F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack vs. SUSE Rancher

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
A solution to deploy and orchestrate applications on a managed Kubernetes platform with centralized, SaaS-based management of distributed applications with a single pane of glass and rich observability. Simplified by managing deployments as one across on-prem, cloud, and edge locations.N/A
SUSE Rancher
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Developed by Rancher Labs and now from SUSE, Rancher is open-source software that enables organizations to deploy and manage Kubernetes at scale, on any infrastructure across the data center, cloud, branch offices, and the network edge. Rancher centrally manages Kubernetes clusters across the organization in order to ensure security and accelerate transformation. Rancher is also available hosted. Hosted Rancher is a fully managed Rancher control plane - presented as the fastest, most cost…
$7,594.99
per year up to 500 nodes
Pricing
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription license
7,594.99
per year up to 500 nodes
Standard Subscription
11,234.99
per year 10 nodes
Priority Subscription
30,514.99
per year 10 nodes
Management Server Priority Subscription
41,830.99
per year 1 instance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Considered Both Products
F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack
Chose F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack
Its capable of a better more powerful hybrid and cloud scenario.
SUSE Rancher

No answer on this topic

Features
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack
7.5
6 Ratings
8% below category average
SUSE Rancher
7.6
7 Ratings
6% below category average
Security and Isolation7.76 Ratings8.06 Ratings
Container Orchestration7.45 Ratings8.77 Ratings
Cluster Management7.45 Ratings7.57 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.45 Ratings7.66 Ratings
Discovery Tools7.15 Ratings6.66 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks7.65 Ratings7.27 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery7.65 Ratings7.96 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging7.55 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings6.86 Ratings
Best Alternatives
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Likelihood to Recommend
6.8
(4 ratings)
8.6
(17 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
5.5
(1 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(3 ratings)
6.8
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
F5 Distributed Cloud App StackSUSE Rancher
Likelihood to Recommend
F5
F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack is quite straightforward with the UI and you can expose the features you want. This simplifies the experience for non-admins
Read full review
SUSE
SUSE Rancher as a management tool becomes useful on a larger scale. Small deployments not so much. If someone also requires Kubernetes capacity or storage, Rancher is an excellent choice. Also, without Kubernetes' skills, it is unlikely that Rancher deployment is going to be a success. Then again if someone else is managing your Kubernetes capacity, setting up the software's capacity will yield greater control. Rancher is not a very integrated solution similar to others in the market.
Read full review
Pros
F5
  • Kubernetes
  • Cloud
  • Ease of use
  • Value
Read full review
SUSE
  • Public and private cloud infrastructure providers based on K8s CAPI
  • REST API that can be used to integrate company services with Rancher
  • GUI that is easy to learn and use in daily operations
  • Builtin GitOps automation solution based on Fleet project
  • It is fully open source
Read full review
Cons
F5
  • It's still a little early so the app feels foreign to our ops teams
  • I would like to customize the UI so I can visually see if I'm in Prod or Dev based on background colors
  • Templates are a little awkward to create
Read full review
SUSE
  • No possibility to snapshot Projects. You can snapshot and restore the whole Kubernetes cluster, but not a Project or Namespace. For this, you have to use external tools.
  • You cannot detach the Rancher-created Kubernetes clusters from Rancher management.
Read full review
Usability
F5
I gave F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack this usability rating because, in my opinion, Documentation and learning resources are key to me providing a perfect score for F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack.
Read full review
SUSE
Overall it deserves an 8 out of 10. The platform is very easy to use as long as the UI is stable. We have had a few buggy versions in the past. However the CLI is excellent and the platform is simple to manage and maintain. It is easy to deploy and offer for company wide use which increases utilization and ROI.
Read full review
Support Rating
F5
generally support is fast
Read full review
SUSE
The documentation is quite complete and there is a very active community that is willing to collaborate and answer questions for those who are just starting out.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
F5
F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack's partner provided services are excellent
Read full review
SUSE
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
F5
Its capable of a better more powerful hybrid and cloud scenario.
Read full review
SUSE
We started using SUSE Rancher in the early days and spent a large amount of time getting to know and love it. This was before the days of some of the likes of Amazon Web Services who may now provide a cheaper but less feature-rich alternative to SUSE Rancher, however we have yet to explore this.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
F5
No answers on this topic
SUSE
The investment for small environments is quite significant. There has to be a compelling case to enhance the areas where SUSE Rancher brings in value to make such a financial leap. There is also a free version to test the value propositions, which will help support the user's buying decisions. More clusters, more volume, more tasks and more complexity in the environment equals more value that Rancher can provide.
Read full review
Return on Investment
F5
  • We don't yet have hard numbers but it is already making a positive impact to the end users.
Read full review
SUSE
  • Shortens "Time-to-Market" factor for new business applications or implementing new functionalities. From 1 to 50 microservices-based business applications in 6 years.
  • 24/7 availability, generates more money. There are many infrastructure components that are regularly powered-off for maintenance or upgrade, bur we rarely are turning off our downstream Kubernetes clusters where our business applications lives.
  • Single Point of Contact with platform maintenance and development Team, eases implementation of new business applications
Read full review
ScreenShots