Fidesic integrates with accounting systems to automate the day-to-day challenges of managing business critical payments and receivables for the small to mid-sized business, creating a paperless process, end to end. The vendor states that it is a solution built to support small to mid-sized companies that seek to streamline the efficiency of their accounts payable or accounts receivable process and are using Microsoft Dynamics GP, QuickBooks, or QuickBooks Online.
$19
per month
ScaleFactor
Score9.5 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Austin-based ScaleFactor provides their small business accounting automation platform designed to combine software and expert assistance to SMBs and remove concern for financial, tax and accounting challenges.
N/A
Pricing
Fidesic
ScaleFactor
Editions & Modules
Fidesic Lite
$19.00
per month
Fidesic Pro
$29.00
per month
Fidesic Enterprise
$49.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Fidesic
ScaleFactor
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$49 per seat
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Fidesic
ScaleFactor
Security
Comparison of Security features of Fidesic and ScaleFactor
Feature
Fidesic
-
Ratings
ScaleFactor
9.5
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Fidesic and ScaleFactor
Feature
Fidesic
-
Ratings
ScaleFactor
9.6
5 Ratings
20% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Fidesic and ScaleFactor
Feature
Fidesic
-
Ratings
ScaleFactor
9.5
5 Ratings
22% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
9.54 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Fidesic and ScaleFactor
Feature
Fidesic
-
Ratings
ScaleFactor
9.0
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Fidesic and ScaleFactor
My experience with Fidesic has been wonderful and it has helped to streamline our payables. We've been able to give our operations teams access in order for them to review their invoices instead of coming to the AP team to do the research.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I work with several businesses and have attempted to bring ScaleFactor into multiple. Thus far the business status/environment has been suitable for ScaleFactor only once, but I'll continue to look for more. ScaleFactor is great when a company has matured beyond the owner making all accounting and banking entries. As soon as multiple systems are needed, it's likely a decent time to call ScaleFactor. I'm confident my operations could run through ScaleFactor for a long time as the next step for us would be something akin to NetSuite or some other more rigid enterprise solution. Additionally, our business has a geographically displaced work force, typically working from home. Having access to all systems via the cloud has been great. No longer do we have to pass a specific computer back and forth for a physical computer software license. It's enabled maximum work flow convenience.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ScaleFactor has been a great resource for me as I got my business off the ground. They have allowed me to focus on marketing and strategy while they handle my Quickbooks and other accounting needs. Great accounting and finance solutions that don't require you to hire an in-house staff
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Could connect with All saving accounts i.e. Building society saving aswell as major banks.
When a connected bank or savings account hasn't been used for a month or 2 it could show a 0 transaction to keep it updated rather then saying "last updated 3 months ago"
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ScaleFactor has been a great resource for me as I got my business off the ground. They have allowed me to focus on marketing and strategy while they handle my Quickbooks and other accounting needs. Great accounting and finance solutions that don't require you to hire an in-house staff.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PaperSave was a complete bust for us. Their OCR was terrible and never really worked. Their customer service was an abomination and we were hung up on by their trainer. GP just could not handle the volume of checks that we had and we were using a lot of MICR ink which became very expensive along with the amount of check stock we were using. Fidesic has streamlined all of that for us and allowed us to process bills and payments but not get bogged down in the stuffing of envelopes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Scale factor, can be used like Xero I believe. However all my past data was already stored in Xero so I used it as an add on. It is a lot more user friendly and helpful, i.e. you don't need to be an accountant to use it. However I am not sure it is useable anymore or supported, so i have gone back to using Xero alone.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
They have been fundamental in helping us grow and scale at a relatively low cost in comparison to out-sourcing these functions. We can spend more on other items that can fuel growth while knowing the back end is taken care of.
They provide automated supports for key areas like payroll, expenses, etc so that we can quickly get back to focusing on the other items.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info