FileInvite vs. Process Street
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileInvite | Score1.1 out of 10 | N/A | FileInvite automates the process of collecting information and documents from your clients. The vendor says the process is simple, and the interface is secure. All you have to do is create and send a FileInvite with the information you require. The client then uploads the files to a secure portal where you can approve or decline the information that has been submitted. FileInvite also allows you to set up reminders, templates and sync with your cloud storage like Google… | N/A |
Process Street | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Process Street in San Francisco offers their application which allows teams to create simple recurring checklists, collaborate around them and track as they’re completed. | $25 per month per user |
| FileInvite | Process Street | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileInvite | Process Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
40% Would buy again 2 Answers | 91% Would buy again 10 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
60% Happy with the feature set 3 Answers | 91% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| FileInvite | Process Street | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting & Analytics |
| |||||||||||||
| Process Engine |
| |||||||||||||
| Collaboration |
| |||||||||||||
| Content Management Capabilties |
| |||||||||||||
| FileInvite | Process Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | TIBCO® BPM Enterprise Score8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | IBM Business Automation Workflow Score10 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileInvite | Process Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.0 | 9.2 |
| Usability | 7.0 | - |
| Performance | 10.0 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Ease of integration | 10.0 | - |
| FileInvite | Process Street | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileInvite Screenshots | Process Street Screenshots |














