FileWall vs. Trellix Endpoint Security ENS
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FileWall | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | odix - a provider of Enterprise CDR (Content Disarm and Reconstruction), is now offering its own native application for securing Microsoft Office 365 mailboxes. CDR technology is a detection-less method to disarm zero-days and Windows Defender (formerly APT)’s in files, that the vendor says is considered by leading analysts as an addition or replacement to existing anti-malware technologies. FileWall™ is designed to run in conjunction with existing Microsoft security solutions such as EOP and… | $2.40 per month per user |
Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) solutions apply proactive threat intelligence and defenses across the entire attack lifecycle to keep organizations safer and more resilient. | N/A |
| FileWall | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| FileWall | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 8 Answers | 80% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | 93% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 8 Answers | 80% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | |
| FileWall | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secure Email Gateway |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FileWall | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Sophos Email Score9.1 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Sophos Email Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ![]() Microsoft Exchange Score8.6 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| FileWall | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 9.4 | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.4 | 5.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 10.0 |
| FileWall | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | FileWall Screenshots | Trellix Endpoint Security ENS Screenshots |










