TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Firebase Crashlytics

    Score9.8 out of 10
    N/ACrashlytics is a mobile analytics tool which helps users find the exact line of code that their app crashed on, providing granular insight into mobile app performance and user experience. Crashlytics was acquired by Google in 2017 and is now offered as part of the Firebase product.N/A

    Selenium

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/ASelenium is open source software for browser automation, primarily used for functional, load, or performance testing of applications.N/A
    Pricing
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    13 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    16 Answers
    Features
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Automation Testing
    Comparison of Automation Testing features of Firebase Crashlytics and Selenium
    Feature
    Firebase Crashlytics
    -
    Ratings
    Selenium
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Record and Automate00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Multi-Browser Testing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Test Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Integrated Version Control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Object Recognition00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Data-Driven Testing00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Testing Reports & Analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Small Businesses
    Branch
    Score6.3 out of 10
    BrowserStack
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AppsFlyer
    Score5.5 out of 10
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Flurry Analytics (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    9.2
    (55 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.2
    (6 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (11 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Firebase CrashlyticsSelenium
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Firebase Crashlytics is a no-brainer if you are already using any of the other Firebase suite of products, as its integration is very easy if you are already using these in your app. If you have cross-platform Android, iOS, and macOS apps, you should also consider Firebase Crashlytics to provide a unified across your platforms. If your app is only on Android or only on Apple, then you may be better off remaining with the default Apple Developer or Google Play Developer Console crash collection experiences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    When you have to test the UI and how it behaves when certain actions are performed, you need something that can automate the browsers. This is where Selenium comes to the rescue. If you have to test APIs and not the frontend (UI), I would recommend going with other libraries that support HTTP Requests. Selenium is good only when you have no choice but to run the steps on a browser.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Providing stack traces that are useful when users have crashes.
    • Tracking crashes per version (app and OS) so we know whether to release a version to everyone instead of a subset.
    • Provides trending crsahes/problems if there's a spike in issues so we can get on it quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • For any web based UI automation, Selenium is the best tool out there to automate your tests.
    • It supports multiple coding languages like Java, Python, Ruby, C# etc.. to choose from.
    • There is a huge community of users and can get many answers on StackOverFlow.
    • It has lot of other plugins to make your tests even more efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • Navigation between the issue listing and details is something difficult to understand for the new user.
    • Pannel takes time in loading may be because of analytics data but it can be reduce.
    • Not provide accurate line number in case of proguarded apps.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Selenium is pretty user-friendly but sometimes tests tend to flake out. I'd say roughly one out of twenty tests yields a false positive.
    • Selenium software cannot read images. This is a minor negative because a free plug-in is available from alternate sources.
    • Slowness may be a minor factor with Selenium, though this is an issue with basically any testing software since waiting on a site to execute JavaScript requires the browser to wait for a particular action.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    Because its fulfilling our basic and necessary requirements that can be an only and enough reason to renew the subscription.
    Read full review
    Open Source
    We love this product mainly because of its high customization abilities and the ease of use. Moreover, its free and can be learned easily through online communities and videos. The tests are more consistent and reliable as compared to Manual tests. It has enabled us to test a large number of features all in one go, which would have impossible through manual tests. The reports generated at the end of the tests are really helpful for the QA and the development teams to get a fair view of the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    It is very easy for non-developer staff to use the Firebase Console and gather information for the development team. Developers will find it straightforward to integrate Firebase Crashlytics into new or existing codebases using Google's in-depth developer documentation. I cannot think of an easier cross-platform solution to use, and because of that I wish it supported more platforms!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    For those who are unfamiliar with coding, there is a bit of a learning curve. There is plenty of helpful documentation and resources but it can take a little time to get the software up and running. Once you get the hang of how Selenium works, and what it can do, you realize how many things you can use it for, and how many processes you can automate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    The Selenium app has a pretty fat community of users. For the problems we are experiencing, we are primarily receiving support from these communities. In addition, there is widespread service support. Instant support is given to the problems we experience when we need Online support. We and our team are happy to provide this support, especially before important deployment processes
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    We did everything we needed to use it. Now we can execute our tests on different operational systems and browsers running few tests simultaneously. We also implemented Appium framework to execute our tests on mobile devices, such as iPhones, iPads, Android phones and tablets. We use SauceLabs for our test execution and Jenkins for continuous integration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Truly speaking, it is also a quite good tool for crash reports, but Firebase Crashlytics was better to use when you are using the Firebase Realtime database as your DB, so the integrations become much easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    At the time of adoption, there were not many other alternatives that were even close to being competitive when it comes to browser testing. As far as I know now to this day, there is still little competition to Selenium for what it does. Any other browser-based testing still utilises Selenium to interact with the browser.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Fix bugs within hours rather than days or weeks
    • Retain users longer by reducing their frustration due to crashes
    • Keep management happy that our app is stable & bug-free
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • There hasn’t been a downside to using it yet other than we’ve got to update the programs we create for each change.
    • This has saved us hundreds of hours of manpower by allowing our automation engineer to rapid fire tests.
    • We are able to screenshot and save entire sites before and after launch with a program the automation engineer created
    • We can compare large volumes of data against data in excel docs with a program created using Selenium
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots