Flexera ONE vs. IBM Z Software Asset Management

Well suited for single pane dashboard of all cloud spending breaking down to group, user, resource level. This allows ability to track down users who have abnormal usage. What is required from the customer's end is extensive time and resources to set the platform up and curate to their desired specifications. You need at least two people dedicated to managing this platform.

Incentivized

• Improved UI with a clean landing page
• New KPI dashboard for quick insights
• Embedded Power BI for advanced analytics
• Flexera ONE Cloud License Management

Incentivized

• Well this is very good tech to manage all the it work but still it has a lot of feature which sometimes feel complex to understand it properly.
• The initial setup is complex.
• Ongoing maintenance is difficult to handle.

Incentivized

1) the platform errors out - once clicking into report findings the platform does not redirect to the correct location. 2) the reporting is often outdated or incorrect. 3) policies have to be updated manually and updated very frequently - policies error out if they are not up to date. --- It came down to build versus buy. After two years of ROI not being visible, we decided to build inhouse. In a few months, we've replicated Flexera ONE's entire platform. This will be more regular and is highly suggested as you have full control over every automated policy being applied in AWS, Azure, and GCP. The dashboard/visibility is also easy as you can use Grafana or Omni to ingest the cost utilization data.

Incentivized

Flexera ONE offers better automation + cost optimization + licensing insights in a single ecosystem

Incentivized

• Cleaning up of messy data.
• It is very powerful tool so it is complex to understand.
• It is well suited for the big companies which faces a major challenges in managing .

Incentivized