FloQast vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FloQast
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly Dynamics NAV) is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. The technology is based on the Navision product acquired by Microsoft in 2002. This product is the best-selling Microsoft ERP platform, and is often used by companies in the manufacturing and distribution verticals.N/A
Pricing
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
8.5
108 Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation9.067 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports8.152 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.237 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.977 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Workflows9.392 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.6
6 Ratings
5% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings7.86 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings9.35 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
16 Ratings
10% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.0
20 Ratings
10% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
5.1
21 Ratings
31% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings5.117 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings5.121 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings5.120 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.8
21 Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings9.020 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.419 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
16 Ratings
10% above category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings9.016 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings6.79 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings9.013 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.9
19 Ratings
2% above category average
Pricing00 Ratings7.117 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings8.016 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings10.011 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.4
11 Ratings
13% above category average
Billing Management00 Ratings8.39 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings7.86 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings8.37 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings10.010 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.7
8 Ratings
13% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
4 Ratings
12% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.7
3 Ratings
25% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
8.0
6 Ratings
14% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings7.55 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.6
3 Ratings
38% above category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings9.43 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings9.72 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.7
3 Ratings
12% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
7.1
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings5.83 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings1.32 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.63 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.5
5 Ratings
27% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
FloQast
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
9.3
2 Ratings
25% above category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Small Businesses
Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 7.9 out of 10
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cube
Cube
Score 9.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(123 ratings)
8.0
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(5 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(5 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(9 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FloQastMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
Likelihood to Recommend
FloQast
If complex close items need to be done in the correct order or multiple subs, FQ makes it a breeze to track. If your close is simple, or done with only a few people, their system might not be a great benefit. With a team of 20, we need a tool like this to keep everyone on the same page!
Read full review
Microsoft
It addresses well some integration and connectivity issues with other software and adapted technologies: formulation and manufacturing batching software, scanners and bar codes, inventory, financials, emailing of invoices and statement, sales and purchasing... etc. I believe it to be better suited to a medium to large company. Not as simple and seamless as we expected for migrating from another Microsoft Dynamics software product (we moved from GP to NAV). Our staff is going through a tougher time than we thought to learn some procedures. Normal growing pains?!
Read full review
Pros
FloQast
  • Provides a clear status of the month end close.
  • Allows us to analyze tasks by team member and reassign as needed.
  • It syncs with our ERP Netsuite to ensure balance sheet reconciliations can be tied out directly.
  • It also connects with Slack to notify users of key deadlines and changes in review status for team tasks.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Automate the creation of bills of materials for production. We can now generate a BoM from a sales order.
  • Organization of all data pertaining to thousands of parts, assemblies, and finished goods. Engineering and purchasing have a common portal.
  • We can create sales orders from quotations instead of re-entering them (this did require some bolt-on software). Less redundant work with fewer entry errors.
  • Accounting can provide reports based on specific criteria stored in NAV. We can pull better and more detailed intelligence.
Read full review
Cons
FloQast
  • A setting to allow for attachments to automatically be opened within the app (Adobe, Excel, etc.) rather than as a separate tab in the browser
  • Some of our tasks are quarterly or annual so assigning a very specific date would be helpful
  • Eliminate the need of "closing" review notes. Once we change the status to Resolved, that should be sufficient. Make Resolved and Closed one and the same
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The version of software that we currently use isn't compatible with Windows 7, therefore we had to install it using the virtual computer under Windows XP. This created a few additional steps that the users had to go through in order to access the software which generated more calls to our IT Helpdesk.
  • We did research how much it would cost to upgrade the software so that we could get a version compatible with Windows 7, but the cost was way too expensive for our organization. Also, when we need to make updates or changes to the software, there are very few consultants who are familiar with the software so we are limited in who we can use for consulting services. Since we are limited in choosing consultants who can make updates and changes to the software the fees are usually really expensive for their services.
  • There is a .zup file that we constantly have to delete in order for the database to work properly and update. Users get a pop-up about once a week asking if they want to replace the .zup file and if the file is not deleted then the opening page for the software will not show up correctly and the database will not have the most up to date information.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
FloQast
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
Microsoft
We've already decided to continue using this software. It is too expensive for us to upgrade so we made a workaround by using the virtual computer with Windows XP installed on it. We did research replacing this software, but it was a better financial decision to keep what we had instead
Read full review
Usability
FloQast
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
Microsoft
It has simplified all processes and reduces turnaround time for month end processes. You can easily navigate through the dashboard which is very user friendly and easily guides you to different functionalities. Duplications of Invoices is avoided because NAV rejects posting of an invoice number already in the system so you increase accuracy.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
FloQast
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Performance
FloQast
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
FloQast
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
Microsoft
It provides one to efficiently be able to manage bookkeeping and inventory without much challenges. One can easily navigate through workflow processes while managing usages and budgets. Being able to produce reports in Word, Excel or PDF means one is able to have a working document to produce trends and graphs or produce pivot tables.
Read full review
In-Person Training
FloQast
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Online Training
FloQast
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
FloQast
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
FloQast
We evaluated BlackLine along with FloQast and ultimately decided to sign up with FloQast. Our team really liked the ability to leverage their existing Excel reconciliation templates that could link to the FloQast user interface. Comparatively, the pre-made reconciliation templates that were demonstrated in BlackLine felt a bit more inflexible and felt like it would invite a longer implementation/conversion timeline.
Read full review
Microsoft
I have personally supported all of the Dynamic family of ERP systems and made the decision to concentrate on NAV as the solution of choice. From a support and development standpoint there are few if any packages that can compare. It is not uncommon for most of the companies that I support to only call me once or twice a month after the first year. This is due to the ease of tracking down problems and errors and the ability for a developer to provide the end-user with routines that automatically correct the most basic kind of error
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
FloQast
I did not help in the purcase
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Scalability
FloQast
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
FloQast
  • ROI has been quick. Using Floqast we were able to put off hiring additional headcount for a year due to the efficiencies we were able to garner.
  • Floqast also helped with change management and process documentation. It centralized work papers into one easy to find location where in the past workpapers were disorganized.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Automation processing, including EDI functionality, has increased employee efficiency and prevented the need for adding additional employees.
  • Implementation of the warehouse functionality, including cycle counts, has resulted in better inventory control/less shrinkage.
  • Implementation of e-Ship and e-Receive, has resulted in greater efficiency and order accuracy.
Read full review
ScreenShots

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations