Flowdock is a collaboration tool built around a chat and team inbox interface. Flowdock is available via app or as a browser-based solution.
It was originally offered by Rally Software Development, which was acquired by CA Technologies, which was acquired by Broadcom in 2018.
Slack is a better product. They're taking the spirit of the startup and moving quickly towards IPO. In my own experience, Slack provides enough software integrations with hope for future releases that continue to improve the product. The early days of Flowdock were very …
Features
Flowdock
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Flowdock
4.9
2 Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management
6.72 Ratings
Gantt Charts
3.01 Ratings
Scheduling
4.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
2.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.22 Ratings
Search
5.72 Ratings
Visual planning tools
6.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Flowdock
3.8
2 Ratings
71% below category average
Chat
8.92 Ratings
Notifications
7.72 Ratings
Discussions
7.72 Ratings
Surveys
2.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
1.01 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
1.01 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
1.01 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
1.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Flowdock is well suited for small teams and to environments that doesn't need too much reliability. I think it has some management problems that can make your life difficult if you have to manage a big amount of users. If you want just a tool communication with basic features (without using any integration or robust features) it can be suitable for you. You should try Flowdock using its free version for a small team and compare with others similar products. Flowdock delivers team chat and collaboration features, but is not necessarily the best product. Maybe some usability problems that disturb me won't be so relevant to you.
One thing a little bit annoying is that a lot of links to others Flowdock sections (preferences, external services, etc) will open a new window/tab. Each click may take you to a new window and you can get lost easily.
There isn't a quick access list to members of your organization to start a private chat. I took a while to find how to do that. The interface and usability could be better.
There isn't an app for Windows Phone.
Sometimes you try to load some conversation and it doesn't show anything. It is not frequently but happens sometimes.
I go with the flow because I'm a newer employee and Flowdock works as advertised. If it were my decision to choose a team communciator for the organization, I'd recommend we go with Slack for its robust features and ever-changing/evolving software integrations. Slack is the outright innovator in the space and will continue to hold that role for some time.
Private chat or channels are well implemented in both softwares and both are also very easy to setup.
Besides of some usability problemas I think Flowdock is still better than Slack in this user experience and design.
The second point is the price. Flowdock is half price of Slack ($3/month). If you are a student or a non-profit organization, you are able to get some special license.