TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Forcepoint CASB vs. Trellix Cloud Workload Security

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Forcepoint CASB

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AForcepoint CASB delivers comprehensive security for SaaS and Generative AI applications by combining API integration with real-time inline controls, ensuring sensitive data stays protected without compromising performance or user experience.N/A

    Trellix Cloud Workload Security

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/ATrellix Cloud Workload Security (formerly from McAfee) to give users a real-time view of running workloads through detecting workloads and pods. This product can integrate with both public and private cloud infrastructures.N/A
    Pricing
    Forcepoint CASBTrellix Cloud Workload Security
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Forcepoint CASBTrellix Cloud Workload Security
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Forcepoint CASBTrellix Cloud Workload Security
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Forcepoint CASBTrellix Cloud Workload Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Forcepoint CASBTrellix Cloud Workload Security
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Forcepoint
    It is appropriate for medium to large-scale enterprises, especially the ones that have remote employees. The live-monitoring feature is extremely useful in this case. However, the implementation and initial processing are headache-inducing so you definitely need a dedicated IT team. Be warned though, that not only is their interface quite complex, their customer service is also extremely unhelpful so you won't be able to implement this or tackle any issues without a skilled team. But if that isn't an issue, this is definitely worth a try!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    Suitable scenario: The McAfee Cloud Workload Security console has helped me a lot in saving physical resources. We no longer have to have a server and spend resources to maintain the console, everything is in the cloud. Unsuitable scenario: After the change to the cloud the McAfee Cloud Workload Security reduced many things that were made very easy when it was on a physical server. Active directory server integration with the console is a bit tricky. That should be improved and be somewhat more friendly when connecting to be able to migrate user machines.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Forcepoint
    • Integration with Forcepoint DLP.
    • Excellent in monitoring shadow IT.
    • Cloud Monitoring can be conducted.
    • UEBA is excellent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Monitoring of detected threats
    • Checking the status of antivirus agents
    • Monitoring of antivirus software installed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Forcepoint
    • Better reports
    • Better technical support
    • Better integration with other solutions as proxy and onpremise DLP
    • Did I say better support?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Improve integration with windows server active directory.
    • The monitoring of the implementation of missing components of the antivirus should be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Forcepoint
    The platform is really good but needs a lot of customization and effort. Need to build an AI platform that will help in customizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Forcepoint
    The expertise is highly lacking in the implementation side.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Forcepoint
    The interface of both the softwares is complex, but Forcepoint is certainly more complicated. But once you get past that, it is quite smooth and offers a lot of amazing features. It is one of the best options for remote security, although I would love to see more features - like encryption. The one place where it truly lacks is customer service, and since it has such an intricate implementation procedure, this one carries a lot of weight and needs to be improved to make this software even more accessible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    We use McAfee Endpoint Security on user PCs and I must say that it is an excellent antivirus. The alerts we have had have been resolved without any problem. I totally recommend it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Forcepoint
    • We are working on strategies to understand what to do with the information that CASB gave to us, it would be good if Forcepoint gives us a few key points but they haven't.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (Musarubra US LLC)
    • Improved resource savings in terms of physical infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots