Forcepoint Data Security Cloud vs. OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint Data Security Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Forcepoint Data Security Cloud is a unified, cloud-delivered platform that combines visibility, control, and threat protection across all channels including endpoints, web, cloud apps, email, and private applications.N/A
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Network Node Manager i is a network management platform acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, and now supported by OpenText.N/A
Pricing
Forcepoint Data Security CloudOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint Data Security CloudOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint Data Security CloudOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint Data Security CloudOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Umbrella
Score 8.8 out of 10
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Umbrella
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint Data Security CloudOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(3 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint Data Security CloudOpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Likelihood to Recommend
Forcepoint
It is very much suited for organizations that have a great consideration of protecting their data/assets. It is an expensive solution. Hence SMB segments require to find out something which can be similar to achive this. However, there are very few players in the market who has single pane configuration pane, which is one of the key benefits of Forcepoint ONE.
Read full review
OpenText
Well-suited for large-scale deployment without needing more servers. Linux installation is quite stable, and Polling of a large number of devices is well managed. Less suited to Network Observability scenarios or cloud network monitoring.
Read full review
Pros
Forcepoint
  • Forcepoint ONE is particularly effective at identifying and blocking sophisticated threats, including those that attempt to evade detection by traditional security solutions.
  • The platform uses a combination of advanced analytics and human expertise to constantly monitor activity on networks and identify anomalies that may indicate an attempted attack that is why Forcepoint ONE can quickly block threats and prevent them from causing damage.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Fault and Performance Monitoring
  • Performance Reporting
  • Alerting and Flexible threhsolds
  • Product stability
Read full review
Cons
Forcepoint
  • There is no need for improvement in the solution. The solution is built with all the required features and capabilities that are required for a security service edge solution.
Read full review
OpenText
  • More out of the box monitoring parameters features
  • Improved GUI
  • Independent reporting functionality within NNMi
Read full review
Usability
Forcepoint
No answers on this topic
OpenText
NNMi's user interface is described as well-designed and intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and perform tasks quickly, thereby enhancing the overall user experience. The system offers a powerful network discovery mechanism that maps out your network's physical and virtual topology, enabling you to visualize connections between devices and identify potential issues. Fault monitoring is at its best. NNMi provides a unified environment for viewing faults, availability, and performance data, consolidating essential information into a single platform.
Read full review
Support Rating
Forcepoint
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Support is long and arduous and often are unable to help resolve the issue. We often have to do escalations or duty manager to get things moved. Even with a technical account manager, we do not see much improvement from a support point of view. This is an area where Micro Focus has a lot of improvement to do.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Forcepoint
Ease of use Microsoft Defender was a great product, but it looked like it is too risky to have only one vendor for all our needs. Fortinet has a lot of improvements to make to consider in the enterprise segment.
Read full review
OpenText
Even though there are many products in the market such as from Solarwinds, CA Spectrum (no DX Spectrum), PRTG that offers similar or even with more flexibility the fault and performance monitoring still Micro Focus is a very nice tool when it comes to Scalability and Stability with all necessary monitoring coverage. There is no external database required and hence less issues with integration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Forcepoint
  • There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question, as the impact of Forcepoint ONE on a business's overall objectives will vary depending on the specific goals and objectives of that particular business.
  • However, in general, businesses that have implemented Forcepoint ONE have seen a positive impact on their overall objectives, with many reporting increased productivity, improved security, and reduced costs.
Read full review
OpenText
  • HP NNM is very good at producing root cause analysis. MTTR is reduced with NNM.
Read full review
ScreenShots