fynk vs. Ironclad

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
fynk
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
fynk is software used to automate the contract lifecycle with AI, allowing users to create, edit, review, approve, electronically sign, analyse and manage contracts from start to finish. fynk provides visibility, control and governance over a company's legal documents. A SaaS, fynk is accessed from a browser.
$89
per month
Ironclad
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.N/A
Pricing
fynkIronclad
Editions & Modules
Essentials
€89
per month
Growth
€249
per month
Advanced
€379
per month
Pro
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
fynkIronclad
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details22% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
fynkIronclad
Considered Both Products
fynk

No answer on this topic

Ironclad
Chose Ironclad
IronClad is a comprehensive platform that allows legal teams, cross functional teams and approvers to keep track of the suggestions and changes made to legal agreements. It keeps everything in a single place, however it lacks the simplicity and practicality of DocuSign …
Chose Ironclad
Ironclad is a well-designed product, especially for a very configurable workflow designer and team collaboration feature. In addition, DocuSign has a critical issue, which is a multi-instance account issue. If you have multiple contracts with Docusign including design and CLM …
Features
fynkIronclad
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
fynk
-
Ratings
Ironclad
6.5
Ratings
22% below category average
Contract creation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract templates00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields00 Ratings3.60 Ratings
Guided logic00 Ratings4.20 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
fynk
-
Ratings
Ironclad
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
Contract sharing00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Contract editing00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
MS Word plug-in00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Approval process00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
fynk
-
Ratings
Ironclad
5.2
Ratings
45% below category average
Contract database00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Contract search00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts00 Ratings2.90 Ratings
Custom contract reports00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Tracking contract status00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Compliance check00 Ratings3.60 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
fynk
-
Ratings
Ironclad
7.7
Ratings
2% below category average
Contract Storage00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
E-Signatures00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Integration with other Systems00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
fynkIronclad
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 10.0 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.6 out of 10
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
fynkIronclad
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
fynkIronclad
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Ironclad is extremely easy to use, without providing much specific direction to new users.
  • It's wonderful to be able to capture the progress of contracts and requests as well as the notes regarding the status.
  • It's easy to tag another colleague into a workflow for their input and approvals as necessary.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Interface is suboptimal
  • It has to be easier to set up new documents and fields. I had to hire a consultant to do the work because it's simply not easy or intuitive
  • AI capability is suboptimal. Often, suggested text has nothing to do with the topic being indexed
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I think it does all the things I need, and it can be simple to use, but it can also be confusing and not intuitive the more functionality you take advantage of. I am especially frustrated by false "form completed" notifications that I receive not only when forms have actually been completed, but also when they've been refreshed from SFDC or otherwise updated.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
IronClad is a comprehensive platform that allows legal teams, cross functional teams and approvers to keep track of the suggestions and changes made to legal agreements. It keeps everything in a single place, however it lacks the simplicity and practicality of DocuSign throughout the signing process, so we usually have to use both platforms to complete a legal workforce
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Increased employee efficiency.
  • Easily supervised contract application status.
  • Easily managed active/inactive contracts.
Read full review
ScreenShots

fynk Screenshots

Screenshot of AI contract analysis at workScreenshot of the creation, negotiation, and signing process, in fynkScreenshot of fynk's multiple document format management featureScreenshot of fynk's collaboration featureScreenshot of an example chart to visualize the content of a contractScreenshot of how fynk replaces multiple tools