Ghost Inspector vs. TestMu AI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ghost Inspector
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Ghost Inspector is a browser test automation and recording tool for testing website and web app functionality, from the company of the same name headquartered in Seattle.N/A
TestMu AI
Score 8.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a Full-Stack Quality Engineering platform that empowers teams to test intelligently and ship faster. Engineered for scale, it offers end-to-end AI agents to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality. The platform enables testing of web, mobile, and enterprise applications at any scale across real devices, real browsers, and custom real-world environments.
$19
per month per user
Pricing
Ghost InspectorTestMu AI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Virtual Live
$19
per month Parallel Test
Real Device Plus Live
$49
per month 1 parallel test
Test Manager
$59
per month per seat
Web Automation on Desktop
$99
per month Parallel Test
Virtual Automation Cloud
$159
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$199
per month Parallel Test
Real Device + Automation Cloud
$249
per month Parallel Test
SmartUI Visual Regression
$269
per month Parallel Test
Kane AI (Mobile + Web)
$349
per month Parallel Test
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
Custom Pricing
per parallel test
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ghost InspectorTestMu AI
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ghost InspectorTestMu AI
Best Alternatives
Ghost InspectorTestMu AI
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 6.2 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ghost InspectorTestMu AI
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(110 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(7 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(62 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ghost InspectorTestMu AI
Likelihood to Recommend
Ghost Inspector
1. It's amazing for all kinds of browser testing. 2. Very easy to use and you can implement it to cover your tests in a short time. 3. You don't need to be a coding guru, many stuff are autogenerated or builtin and can be easily implemented without huge efforts 4. Reporting and UI is easy to understand and navigate through
Read full review
TestMu AI
One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
Read full review
Pros
Ghost Inspector
  • UI Integration tests
  • Asynchronas execution of suites and tests
  • Easy way to generate steps of the tests with Chrome plugin
Read full review
TestMu AI
  • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
  • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
  • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
Read full review
Cons
Ghost Inspector
  • The number of available integrations is small, but I see more integrations are coming on the way
  • Provide builtin alerting system in case of test failures
  • Improve provide more roles not only user and administrator. A viewer role for example
Read full review
TestMu AI
  • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
  • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
  • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
Read full review
Usability
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
yes always available
Read full review
Performance
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
haven't found any glitch while using this
Read full review
Support Rating
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ghost Inspector
1. Faster in terms of time when building the integration browser tests 2. No or minimum development skills needed. 3. No server management is needed on our end. 4. Covers a lot of browsers and cases 5. Builtin integrations for different stuff like slack and PD 6. Fast and provides asynchronous executions
Read full review
TestMu AI
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
Read full review
Scalability
Ghost Inspector
No answers on this topic
TestMu AI
not all department, but we're using for our clients
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ghost Inspector
  • We saved a lot of money by using this tool instead of purchasing expensive ones
  • The implementation of integrations test was supposed to take 6 months of development. With GI it took 2 months only
  • Training QA to build integration tests using GI is much less that any other tool that might need development skills
Read full review
TestMu AI
  • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
  • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
  • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
Read full review
ScreenShots

TestMu AI Screenshots

Screenshot of An automated screenshot.Screenshot of Mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Some of the available integrations.Screenshot of Real-time testingScreenshot of Responsive testing