GitKraken vs. Qlerify

GitKraken

Qlerify

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
GitKraken	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.	$1,250 per installation
Qlerify	Score 9.2 out of 10	Small Businesses (1-50 employees)	Qlerify is an AI powered and collaborative process and data modelling tool. Qlerify bridges the gap between stakeholders and enables users to turn their domain knowledge into visual process models and system specifications in a format that developers can use to create better software faster. Qlerify can visualise a complex discussion with many stake holders in real-time and produce actionable blueprints for developers in record-time. Some features of Qlerify: 1. Co-editing…	$0 per month per user

Pricing

GitKraken

Qlerify

Editions & Modules

Installed by You: $1250
per installed license
Hosted by GitKraken: Customized according to the amount of team members.

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
GitKraken	Qlerify
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Qlerify also offers team and project based pricing. Please contact Qlerify les for more information.

More Pricing Information

Features

GitKraken

Qlerify

Process Engine

Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
	GitKraken - Ratings	Qlerify 9.0 4 Ratings 7% above category average
Process designer	00 Ratings	9.44 Ratings
Support for modeling languages	00 Ratings	8.73 Ratings

Collaboration

Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
	GitKraken - Ratings	Qlerify 8.8 4 Ratings 7% above category average
Social collaboration tools	00 Ratings	8.84 Ratings

Content Management Capabilties

Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
	GitKraken - Ratings	Qlerify 9.1 1 Ratings 11% above category average
Content management	00 Ratings	9.11 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	GitKraken	Qlerify
Small Businesses	Git Score 10.0 out of 10	Square 9 Softworks Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Git Score 10.0 out of 10	Square 9 Softworks Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Perforce Helix Core Score 6.3 out of 10	IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	GitKraken	Qlerify
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (4 ratings)	9.2 (4 ratings)
Usability	7.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	GitKraken	Qlerify
Likelihood to Recommend	GitKraken (formerly Axosoft) The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Qlerify Extremely well suited for process development and since it closes the gap between ICT and Business, for software development. It is less appropriate in cases where swimlane type of process map doesn't suit well. Kimmo Järvelin Management consultant Read full review
Pros	GitKraken (formerly Axosoft) Customizable workflow steps help organize projects Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Qlerify Streamlined UI Real-time collaboration Jira integration Jussi Mononen Managing Partner Read full review
Cons	GitKraken (formerly Axosoft) Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Qlerify We would have like to known about them a bit earlier. Ivan Ferrigno CPO (Chief Product Officer) Read full review
Usability	GitKraken (formerly Axosoft) Once you get the hang of Axosoft, I think it's easy to use however... getting the hang of it takes quite a bit of time. Additionally, once Axosoft makes an update, it can be difficult to find your bearings again. Like I said, once you know how to use the product, I think it's easy but it takes a bit to become comfortable and confident with Axosoft Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Qlerify No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	GitKraken (formerly Axosoft) I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Qlerify I haven't officially evaluated other process mapping tools. I have however used many tool during the past 30 years. Qlerify is first I am excited about. Kimmo Järvelin Management consultant Read full review
Return on Investment	GitKraken (formerly Axosoft) Productivity bump for developers over previous software Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Qlerify It has enabled me to achieve results faster Qlerify helps find better solutions Qlerify has enabled results we have not achieved with other tools Qlerify's collaboration features improve team and management buy-in Jussi Mononen Managing Partner Read full review
ScreenShots		Qlerify Screenshots