TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cursor

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/ACursor is an IDE and code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor includes an autocomplete that predicts the next edit. Once enabled, it is always on and will suggest edits to code across multiple lines.

    $30

    per month

    Google Antigravity

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Antigravity is an agentic development platform designed to orchestrate multiple autonomous AI agents that perform end-to-end software engineering tasks—including planning, code generation, refactoring, and verification—across the editor, terminal, and browser.

    $20

    per month

    Pricing
    CursorGoogle Antigravity
    Editions & Modules
    Team - Premium
    $30
    per month
    Team - Super
    $100
    per month
    Team - Ultimate
    $200
    per month
    Bundled with Google AI Pro
    $20
    per month
    Bundled with Google AI Ultra
    $100-$200
    per month
    Organization plan via Google Cloud
    Consumption-Based API Pricing
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CursorGoogle Antigravity
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsCursor is now available as part of The X Subscription. A discount is available for annual billing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CursorGoogle Antigravity
    Considered Both Products
    SpaceX
    Chose Cursor
    Cursor is fast and cheap, but for some tasks I can't rely on it; I use Claude Code for more complex tasks or to enhance the UI.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cursor
    Cursor is superior because its integration is easy; it provides the same benefits as the others, but it does so by managing LLMs in a more intuitive way. The fact that it is now proprietary to SpaceXAI might make the use of Grok more efficient and maybe cheaper for users …
    Incentivized
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    CursorGoogle Antigravity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (11 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (11 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CursorGoogle Antigravity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SpaceX
    Less appropriate for people who don't use LLMs to code but instead to create artifacts. Cursor is a fluid development platform, not something that will create an artifact to run in the cloud. Well designed to work on teams, to manage the code and how the LLMs interact with the code itself. Great for deep vibe coding.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Pros
    SpaceX
    • API creation.
    • Integrations
    • Plan mode for large tasks.
    • Refactoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    SpaceX
    • The CLI agent can be quite finicky via ACP.
    • It can be hard to understand how much different models will cost.
    • Support can be unresponsive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Likelihood to Renew
    SpaceX
    Cursor is the best AI-powered IDE available today. The agents intelligently absorb context from the code, memory, and rules, and are capable of iterating with subagents until acceptance criteria is met.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    SpaceX
    Cursor is useful for all our developer team. Each and every team member use Cursor for coding and also Cursor has various models like composer, codex, claude and openai models which helps a lot for quality codings. Also Cursor help to create documents in md file format with markdown and preview which helps a lot.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    SpaceX
    graphical user interface is really the thing that setting apart because other code harnesses are really focused on commandline interfaces but whenever you want a good graphical interface with all of the tools and workflow that us software developers we want I think that Cursor is the one that has done it the best out of all of the code harnesses that we’ve tried
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    SpaceX
    • Development speed increased at least 25%
    • The result of the final Product is better than before/without it
    • We use it as a standard now
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots