Google Cloud DNS vs. Quadient Accounts Receivable

Google cloud is well suited to access and collaborate on documents where more than 2 people are required to contribute and in instances where feedback from individuals is captured on the document itself. If a team is working on an end of year report for funders, a few key members may need to finalise a report by offering suggestions that can be viewed and resolved by other team members. Housing documents on Google Cloud is the most appropriate platform I have ever used for tasks like these. If minimal collaboration needs engagement from just 2 individuals, it may be easier to simply email the information between each other, rather than using time to create a folder, ensure access control and upload the information to Google Cloud for collaborative input

Incentivized

Amazing tool for workflow automation, customer self service, housing customer information in one repository, risk assessment for customers. Less helpful for cash forecasting and a bit more rigid for workflow set ups if the customer has multiple accounting pathways to send notifications to.

• Interface is user friendly
• It is safe , Secure and reliable
• It has lower pricing plans
• They have good customer support
• They do have good documentation to have fair ideas on their offerings

Incentivized

• User friendly dashboard
• Ease of use setting up workflows
• Easy to follow aging report to reconcile
• DSO on the front home page

Incentivized

• It is hard for first time user to get used to it.
• Support is restricted for 3rd party services who uses it
• Sometimes the support people take more than 24hrs to reply to our queries, But it is not for all issues.
• Search function could have been made easy to search records

Incentivized

• Workflows are not set up to easily choose different billing contact choices (invoice, inquiry statements to different aliases)
• Cash forecasting graphics are unhelpful and can be refined
• DSO calculation is set at 365 day average only - there are no options to view DSO averages by collector or 90 days averages

Amazing tool which we love. Definitely something to consider if you have a high volume of customers or your team runs lean as it does a lot of the touches without human support

This is exceptionally simple to utilize in the event that you are as of now utilizing Google Cloud Services or you are important for the Google Ecosystem as of now. I accept this is likely the primary goal of Google Cloud DNS, to give a more complete set-up of devices to Google Cloud clients. Consequently, I would rate convenience a 9.

Super easy set up - does not need Admin support to create workflows or templates - anyone with a sense of receivables processes can do it

In the event that you are utilizing Google Cloud Platform as your cloud supplier, Google Cloud DNS is unquestionably the DNS supplier to utilize.

I haven't required help for it yet, notwithstanding, in my experience, Google Support is incredible.

Amazon Route 53 offers almost equal or slightly more features than Google Cloud DNS; we selected Google Cloud DNS because the rest of our projects use Google Cloud Platform.

Also, since AWS is a bigger service provider, their pricing is also higher; since Google Cloud DNS pricing is better, we went for it.

Incentivized

Quadient stacked up pretty well. Pricing was a bit higher than what we wanted to spend; however, based on the value we are receiving in a streamlined product, we pulled the trigger on it. Dunning was a bit more limited and manual process in the collections process so we opted for Quadient.

Incentivized

• We use GCP for all our projects so Google Cloud DNS fits perfectly
• It is proving to scale well so good for us since we are a growing company
• It is easy to use and doesn't require a separate team to maintain

Incentivized

• Decrease in our DSO which was relatively high before
• Ease of use by our customers to gather statements or invoices
• Ease of use platform for all employees

Incentivized