TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Google Cloud Identity vs. OCI Identity and Access Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Google Cloud Identity

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AGoogle Cloud Identity is a unified identity, access, app, and endpoint management (IAM/EMM) platform that gives users access to apps with single sign-on, provides multi-factor authentication to protect users and company data, and enforces policies for personal and corporate devices and endpoints.N/A

    OCI Identity and Access Management

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AOracle Cloud Infrastructure Identity and Access Management is a solution to manage user access and entitlements for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and across a wide range of cloud and on-premises applications using a cloud native, identity as a service (IDaaS) platform.

    $3.20

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Google Cloud IdentityOCI Identity and Access Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    OCI IAM External Users
    $0.016
    per month per user
    OCI IAM Oracle Apps Premium
    $0.25
    per month per user
    OCI IAM Premium
    $3.20
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Google Cloud IdentityOCI Identity and Access Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Google Cloud IdentityOCI Identity and Access Management
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Google Cloud Identity and OCI Identity and Access Management
    Feature
    Google Cloud Identity
    9.0
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    OCI Identity and Access Management
    8.0
    8 Ratings
    3% below category average
    ID-Management Access Control8.01 Ratings8.78 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication10.01 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings8.98 Ratings
    Password Management00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings7.48 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.36 Ratings
    ID Risk Management00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Google Cloud IdentityOCI Identity and Access Management
    Small Businesses
    JumpCloud
    Score9.3 out of 10
    JumpCloud
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Google Cloud IdentityOCI Identity and Access Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (4 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Google Cloud IdentityOCI Identity and Access Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    For example, if the system you are building is a general application service that does not primarily focus on ID management, it would be wise to use a service like Google's rather than developing your own IDaaS. While there may be cases where an IDaaS other than Google's is acceptable, Google is likely one of the best solutions when considering user recognition and ease of use. On the other hand, Gmail addresses are commonly used for other purposes, and users may not pay much attention to password management, so you should avoid using them for systems that require security. To strengthen security, you should consider making multi-factor authentication mandatory, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Scenarios where IDCS is well suited:
    • Oracle Identity Cloud Service is well-suited for organizations that require a centralized approach to managing user access and authentication across multiple applications and services.
    • Organizations with strict compliance requirements
    Scenarios where IDCS might be less appropriate:
    • Organizations with limited customization requirements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Two-factor authentication available.
    • The Google authentication method is familiar to many users.
    • It is expected that it will also support authentication methods that will become common in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Restrict access to the applications outside our organization network.
    • Multiple IDP configurations make it easy for us to authorize access.
    • The adaptive security feature lets us know high-risk users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • This time, I investigated it in advance, and it worked as expected, so I don't have any specific ideas for improvement.
    • Additionally, if we were using another IDAAS, it would have been beneficial to have knowledge on how to integrate it with Google tools, along with some relevant case studies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The web interface has gotten better over the years, but some functionality is still being handled via shell commands.
    • SSL setup can be simplified into one place instead of having to navigate to multiple pages and update different key-stores or wallets.
    • Migrating and or replicating between versions can be more intuitive with a side-by-side comparison of schema/attributes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    I chose Google because I thought it would be the best fit, but I didn't fully consider other cloud platforms (Azure, AWS, etc.), so I rated it 8. We assume that current Japanese users are familiar with Google, because we feel that there are far more people with Google email addresses than those with IDs on other cloud services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Oracle cloud services meets most of our needs. I hope in the future we could look at more of the OIG functions included so we could move away from needing to stand up that component.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    We have contacted Oracle support a few times regarding admin access queries and every time we received prompt replies and help. In my experience, we only contacted 2 times in 3 years. I think it's because of ease of use and manageability. Also, Oracle Identity Cloud Service customer care team was pretty fast and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    We adopted Google Cloud Identity as an additional feature because it allowed us to integrate with it using multi-factor authentication. The IBM Cloud platform remains valid, and we have no plans to discontinue its use for identity management. From the user's perspective, we simply added more authentication options. This also ensures we are prepared for future use when multi-factor authentication becomes available for user apps on the IBM Cloud.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I believe we had a quite fair RFP listing all our complex integration and being key on utilizing existing investments, the Oracle product met our requirements and the local partner presented that very well. With such combined synergy, the offering was appealing to be the winning bid and therefore Oracle Identity Management was selected.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    I hope at some point we could get away from needing to "bring our own" licenses and just have a unique user login rate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Google
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Oracle provided various services we could take advantage of to get the environment configured correctly without needing to hire contractors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • From a business perspective, there were two steps.
    • First, we switched from our in-house ID management system to a cloud service. This allowed us to focus our development resources on application development.
    • At the same time, we were able to localize the handling of personal information, which resulted in increased efficiency in management aspects, including handling external inquiries, and in the development of encryption.
    • The second step was adding Google Cloud Identity as an option.
    • This allows more users to easily use our services. It can be said that this has improved user convenience.
    • I expect Google to accommodate future changes in authentication requirements, such as biometric authentication.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • I'm not sure we've seen actual ROI by implementing this product. We had many efforts to look at alternatives and to evaluate newer versions (OIG). In the end, we decided to replace it with Sailpoint.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots