Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.
N/A
Statsig
Score8.9 out of 10
N/A
Statsig is a feature management with feature flags, pulse, holdouts, from the company of the same name in Bellevue.
N/A
Pricing
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Statsig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
Custom
annual pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Statsig
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Statsig
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Google Content Experiments (discontinued) and Statsig
Feature
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Statsig
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Google Content Experiments (discontinued) and Statsig
Feature
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Statsig
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Google Content Experiments (discontinued) and Statsig
Do you already have Google Analytics? If so content experiments is a good, free, starting point to dip your toes in A/B testing. Do you need to run Multivariate experiments? If so, Google Content Experiments is not going to fit your needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This is clearly a platform built around experimentation first, and it shows. In this way Statsig is way ahead of the competition of products I've used previously! It's more data science focussed which makes configuration of new experiments complex with a learning curve.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
For the most part it is pretty easy to use. - There are some quirks with the javascript SDK (getExperiment().getValue?). - The Events vs. Metrics design pattern is complex, and creating new Metrics from Events can be frustrating if you are trying to use event metadata - It's really frustrating not to be able to link Static IDs (before a user signs up) to User IDs, in order to follow users all the way through onboarding, or to log events that occur for signed in users when you are exposing the experiment to users before they've signed up
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info