Flutter by Google vs. Trumpia

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Flutter
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Flutter is an open-source mobile application development framework created by Google. It is used to develop applications for Android and iOS, as well as being the primary method of creating applications for Google Fuchsia.
$0
Trumpia
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Trumpia's automated texting software goes beyond contact collection and mass texting. It offers the possibility of creating personalized interactions with contacts. Trumpia can be used to create custom-tailored workflows and automation. The texting software offers a sophisticated set of
$94
per month
Pricing
Flutter by GoogleTrumpia
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlutterTrumpia
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCore Plans and Advanced Plans have different monthly and yearly pricing options depending on the number of text messages that will be sent. All Advanced Plans include Workbench; an automated text message workflow builder with drag-and-drop functionality. Add-ons like additional users, dedicated short codes, dedicated account manager or campaign consulting are also available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Flutter by GoogleTrumpia
Best Alternatives
Flutter by GoogleTrumpia
Small Businesses
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
OneSignal
OneSignal
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
EZ Texting
EZ Texting
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Airship
Airship
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Flutter by GoogleTrumpia
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(17 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Flutter by GoogleTrumpia
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Flutter by Google is well suited where you have to make an app across multiple platforms like iOS, Android, Web, Desktop and you don't have the bandwidth to create multiple teams for the Native app. This makes sure you have a faster development and you don't have to worry about how your product will look across different platforms. It is also very smooth/fast in response, making it close to feel like a Native app, this makes it an easy pick for a Fintech product where speed matters. Flutter by Google also has a huge library of Components, which are well tested and developed by Google's Flutter by Google team itself, making the development even more fast since the majority of required components are already available.
Read full review
Trumpia
Trumpia is very good for a small to mid-size company that sends out texts 1 to 2 times a month. If you are large organization, have a lot of email records and/or send out texts very frequently throughout the month Trumpia may not be the most cost effective option. In that case it might be better to explore whether or not your CRM has text message functionality and see how that compares to Trumpia
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • User interface design works great across all platforms, including native styling for iOS/macOS.
  • Native compilation for mobile platforms and a decent rendering engine results in slick apps that can make the most of your device.
  • Dart is a well thought out language and easy to pick up.
  • Makes cross-platform development of good looking GUI apps a doddle.
Read full review
Trumpia
  • Account Management
  • Customer Service
  • Automated Text Campaigns
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Occasionally updates to the Flutter SDK result in wide-sweeping changes that seem to not be thoroughly tested and considered. Flutter sometimes evolves too fast for its own good.
  • While the 3rd-party Flutter package ecosystem is vast and rich, 1st-party support for basic things (audio/video playback, battery information, Bluetooth services, etc.) are lacking. You are occasionally forced to rely on an open-source package for use-cases that other platforms have native support for.
  • Documentation, particularly around testing, is lacking. While there are some great docs, like the Dart Style Guide, many Flutter-focused support documents are lacking in quality and real-world usability.
  • Flutter allows you to architect an app however you want. While this is a great feature, it also adds complexity and leads to the current state of Flutter's state management, where there are 50+ options on how to organize your app, with very little official guidance or recommendations from the Flutter team. For a beginner, this can create decision paralysis.
Read full review
Trumpia
  • They could do a better job of bridging the gap between their platform and client's CRMs to ensure that information is shared in both places.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
No answers on this topic
Trumpia
It is easy to use and I am now familiar with the platform
Read full review
Usability
Google
Flutter by Google is very easy to start with. The initial setup they provide is very helpful and easy to understand. The default project setup is also good and can be deployed to production without changing much. Flutter by Google provides a huge library of components, which are created and tested by their own team, making the development of application much faster and robust. Flutter by Google also has a huge community support where we can find components built by the community and we can contribute our own components as well, which helps in faster dev time. Applications developed using Flutter by Google are very smooth, almost feels like native, which helps in creating good impression on customers/clients.
Read full review
Trumpia
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
I have experience with react and React Native. I would say that the idea behind all those frameworks are quite similar. However, I found the javascript-based frameworks a bit more accessible as you could utilise your javascript knowledge. Here, Flutter works with its own language. This has advantages and disadvantages sometimes. I found the community around javascript frameworks bigger and therefore sometimes more helpful. However, Flutter does a good job here as well. I think the main argument for Flutter is its usability for less experienced developers. If you do not have knowledge in javascript or other programming languages then I think it is much easier to start with Flutter than with another framework like react. I think the package that you get form scratch is better than in the other frameworks were you have to set up and learn a lot more before you can start.
Read full review
Trumpia
We have only used Trumpia since we began sending out promotional text messages back in 2016. We have been very happy with Trumpia therefore we have not had to explore any other providers. The only other option that we may explore in the future is sending out promotional texts messages directly through our CRM and see how that works
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • The rapid development capabilities of Flutter allow us to build apps we could not have previously considered commercially viable, opening new revenue streams.
  • Free and open licensing made adoption very easy (ie. free/low cost!).
  • In comparison to Qt, our time spent arguing with build tools and perfecting development environments has decreased substantially.
Read full review
Trumpia
  • Trumpia has helped us improve our efficiency.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Trumpia Screenshots

Screenshot of Trumpia is an omni-channel platform: it can be used to send both text messages and emails.Screenshot of Trumpia features an AI message generator for texts and emails.Screenshot of The email editor features drag-and-drop elements to create customized marketing emails.Screenshot of More than 20 email templates availableScreenshot of Automated text message workflows templates - general templates and especial workflows for different industries.Screenshot of Example of an automated text message workflow with drag-and-drop-functionality.