Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Score10 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Google Threat Intelligence, based on the expertise and service of Mandiant, aims to accelerate security and risk decision making – operational as well as strategic – and to enable security teams to focus on threats that matter to them. | N/A |
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management. | $2.50 per user/per month |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Priced by company size | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 17 Answers | 96% Would buy again 157 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | 99% Delivers good value for the price 146 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | 95% Happy with the feature set 155 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 8 Answers | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 130 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 14 Answers | 95% Implementation went as expected 140 Answers | |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 8.4 |
| Usability | 7.6 | 8.6 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 7.3 |
| Configurability | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.1 |
| Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Google Threat Intelligence (Mandiant) Screenshots | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots |











