GraphQL vs. Microsoft Access
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GraphQL | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for fulfilling those queries with existing data. GraphQL provides an understandable description of the data in an API, to give clients the ability to ask for exactly what they need and nothing more, to make it easier to evolve APIs over time, and enables developer tools. It is free to use and open source under an MIT license. | $0 |
![]() Microsoft Access | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Access is a database management system from Microsoft that combines the relational Microsoft Jet Database Engine with a graphical user interface and software-development tools. | $139.99 per PC |
| GraphQL | Microsoft Access | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GraphQL | Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 29 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Delivers good value for the price 29 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 19 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 91% Implementation went as expected 21 Answers | |
| GraphQL | Microsoft Access | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relational Databases |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GraphQL | Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | MariaDB Platform Score9.1 out of 10 | Amazon RDS Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PostgreSQL Score8.8 out of 10 | SingleStore Score8.2 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SQLite Score8 out of 10 | SAP IQ Score5.2 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| GraphQL | Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 7.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 7.6 |
| Availability | - | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.4 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 10.0 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 5.0 |
| GraphQL | Microsoft Access | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| ScreenShots |





