Hex (Hex Technologies, headquartered in San Francisco) helps people use data by building a collaborative, shareable analytics workspace. The Hex solution helps users empower users to ask new questions and share their findings in one product without any friction.
$75
per month per Author/Admin
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…
N/A
TensorFlow
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.
N/A
Pricing
Hex.tech
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Editions & Modules
Team
$75
per month per Author/Admin
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hex
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hex.tech
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Features
Hex.tech
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Hex.tech
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
00 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
00 Ratings
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
MDM Integration
00 Ratings
7.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Hex.tech
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
22 Ratings
19% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Visualization
00 Ratings
6.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
00 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Hex.tech
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
22 Ratings
15% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
00 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Encryption
00 Ratings
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
00 Ratings
9.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Hex.tech
-
Ratings
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
22 Ratings
10% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
00 Ratings
9.218 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
00 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
00 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Hex.tech is an excellent tool for a product intelligence or product analytics team that wants to enable widespread use of available data for decision-making. It requires some SQL experience in many cases but makes it possible to go far without complex querying skills.
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time.
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice