Hiver is a customer service platform that brings together communication channels, apps, and data to improve customer support operations. Hiver enables real-time collaboration across every customer communication channel, offering AI and automation to resolve issues and help teams work faster. Hiver states that over 10,000 teams of all shapes and sizes globally from Flexport to Harvard University, Vacasa, and Epic Games rely on Hiver to deliver support that wins and retains customers for…
$24
per month per user
SendFox
Score10 out of 10
N/A
A tool to automatically send customized emails to subscribers, followers, and fans. SendFox is an email marketing tool designed specifically for content creators that lets users compose and send unlimited customized emails. SendFox combines automation and customization to help create simple, beautiful, and effective emails in less time. Users can automatically draft emails with SendFox’s integrated weekly Smart Campaigns and RSS content updates, so fans will get content…
$49
one-time fee per user
Pricing
Hiver
SendFox
Editions & Modules
Lite
$24
per month per user
Growth
$34
per month per user
Pro
$59
per month per user
Elite
Contact Sales
SendFox
$49
one-time fee per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hiver
SendFox
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$49 one-time fee per user
Additional Details
20% discount for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hiver
SendFox
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Hiver and SendFox
Feature
Hiver
9.0
4 Ratings
9% above category average
SendFox
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ticket response
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Hiver and SendFox
Feature
Hiver
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
SendFox
-
Ratings
External knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Hiver and SendFox
Feature
Hiver
8.5
4 Ratings
6% above category average
SendFox
-
Ratings
Customer portal
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Hiver and SendFox
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
SendFox
5.8
1 Ratings
32% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Hiver and SendFox
One scenario where Hiver works really well is in a shared support or billing inbox or anywhere multiple team members need access to the same messages. For example, when a customer emails about a billing question, we used to reply and manually loop in the billing team or forward the message. That often caused confusion, especially when someone forgot to “reply all” or responded only to the teammate instead of the customer.Now with Hiver, we just assign the conversation to the billing inbox, and whoever is available can respond. Everyone on the team can see the thread, status, and notes, which avoids duplicated efforts and missed replies. We also used to rely on Google Groups, but it wasn’t clear if someone had already replied, and there was no easy way to collaborate behind the scenes. Hiver completely solved that for us.As for situations where Hiver might be less ideal, I’d say if your team isn’t using Gmail or Google Workspace, then it’s probably not a good fit. It’s really designed for teams that live in Gmail so the team doesn't have to learn a new system. I'm sure some businesses will require a more robust ticketing solution but for our use case, this was a perfect option to improve outcomes, client service, and satisfaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SendFox is perfect for when you are needing to send emails irregularly to a medium-sized list and don't want high fees. Whilst there aren't fancy templates like other services, this can be perfect if you are just wanting to send simple, quick emails vs more in-depth graphical ones. It's great for smaller businesses as well due to the low cost.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
True ticketing solutions are certainly more robust in that you can typically manage social media channels and phones, etc. But, in my opinion, when you don't have a team solely responsible for managing a ticketing system they can be complicated to implement. With HIVER, we're already all accustomed to managing our own G-Suite inbox, so it was simply a matter of teaching the team how to utilize the solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Mailchimp costs a lot once you get into the 4000 contacts range and features that SendFox has integrated are in a higher cost plan from Mailchimp. Drip is in a similar range cost-wise. It costs more per month than I paid all up. For a business that relies on email marketing as an income strategy, these tools are perfect, but for my business which uses it intermittently to supplement things like group challenges, it's more applicable to go with a tool like SendFox.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The ROI on showing how many emails are being received and addressed in a timely manner are great for KPIs
the ability to search and ensure emails are not being deleted as an automatic report is sent out the following day saying if any emails were deleted by whom
the ability to automate who gets assigned what emails from specific vendors per entity
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's been the service I've used for daily emails for group challenges - Meaning that I had a service that was cheaper than others AND was reliable. When the customers got the emails reliably, I retained them, customers.
It has been less flexible in terms of customization - This hasn't had a tangible benefit but may have had a lead-on effect of the emails not always looking as professional to the customer.
It is much cheaper than other services meaning I've saved likely $2000+ based on the size of my email list (which is a lot for my small business!).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info