Hornetsecurity VM Backup vs. SharePlex

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Hornetsecurity VM Backup (formerly Altaro) is a backup and replication solution for Hyper-V and VMware virtual machines. VM Backup can manage large infrastructures, with the revamped backup repository providing long-term storage and more efficient use of disk space.
$59.80
per VM/per year
SharePlex
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
SharePlex from Quest Software is a data replication software offering near real-time replication and supporting a wide variety of databases.N/A
Pricing
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Editions & Modules
Subscription License - Standard Edition
$59.80
per VM/per year
Subscription License - Unlimited Edition
$73.80
per VM/per year
Subscription License - Unlimited Plus Edition
$89.20
per VM/per year
Perpetual License - Standard Edition
$595
per host
Perpetual License - Unlimited Edition
$695
per host
Perpetual License - Unlimited Plus Edition
$875
per host
Free
Free
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Considered Both Products
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Each of the products got its own strengths. For me, it is all about the customer, and about their requirements. Altaro is very good software, and I can get protected what I need to for our customers, and that is the most important part.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
I have not previously used any other VM backup solution prior to testing Altaro VM Backup.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
The only other competitor I am personally familiar with is Carbonite. I use that for file-level backups throughout my network and it works well but while it does offer backups for virtual machines, I have never found it to be a reliable option. Jobs failed for me regularly for …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
While there are other solutions on the market, we have stuck with Altaro because it is such a great value for the dollar.
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
When we have looked for a VM backup solution we've tried some other competitors, even to backup just data and not all VM. We've tested Acronis backup that is a complete solution but more expensive and more complicated, we've also tried Nakivo but didn't convince us the …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
We backup all VMs with both Altaro and Arcserve. Altaro is very powerful when it's time to back up and restore, but gets corrupted too often. Arcserve assures that we always have a safe copy of the VMs, but the backup and restore process is very slow. Can take days to restore a …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
  • Veeam seems like another excellent backup solution, and appears to have many similar features to Altaro VM Backup but also seemed more complicated to set up when I tried 5+ years ago.
  • Also, at the time, Veeam's licensing was very confusing where you needed to count CPU's on the …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Altaro brings value to organizations looking at other platforms. It's definitely less expensive overall than Veeam, Datto or Infrascale. The recovery solution for Altaro is very good and reliable. Any organization looking at Veeam should consider Altaro as a potential …
Chose Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Lower cost, same reliability, 24 hour support
SharePlex
Chose SharePlex
SharePlex support is an award-winning team, which is available for 24 hours, and any time they have solutions with perfect expertise. Besides, SharePlex has supported data migration, with multiple reporting features that ensure there are comprehensive database evaluations. The …
Chose SharePlex
SharePlex was a clear winner in comparison to its competitors. It beats GoldenGate on price, providing equivalent features and performance at a fraction of the price and without the need to license costly Oracle features at the database level. DB Visit was a strong contender …
Chose SharePlex
At the time we did our proof of concept (2011), Shareplex was up and running within a couple of hours. The Goldengate techs were unable to get their product to work. Pricing for Shareplex was half of what Oracle quoted. Goldengate did not include monitoring or compare/repair …
Chose SharePlex
SharePlex is more robust than GoldenGate when it comes to replicating the particular transactions in our environment. GoldenGate has the advantage of supporting hetrogeneous databases, but it does not apply to us since we use a single database platform in this setting. In …
Features
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
9.5
Ratings
10% above category average
SharePlex
-
Ratings
Universal recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
SharePlex
-
Ratings
Continuous data protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Replication10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware protection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cohesity Data Cloud
Cohesity Data Cloud
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hornetsecurity VM BackupSharePlex
Likelihood to Recommend
Altaro VM Backup is great if you have 1 or 2 VMs that aren't backed up by any other means. I initially had some issues with setting it up so it backed up to a NAS, and sometimes the host wouldn't sync to the client. There probably wouldn't be an issue if the host system is the backup location. The interface and configuration were pretty intuitive and gave you a lot of information on the status of your backups.
Read full review
SharePlex is best suited for replicating relatively small but steady streams of data, instead of huge amounts of data surge. Keep in mind that it relies on database logs (redo logs in Oracle) to replicate data in the form of "messages", and therefore it is mandatory to put the database in forced logging mode - that may be a prohibiting factor in some situations.
Read full review
Pros
  • Fast and simple setup. I didn't need to read through ANY documentation to set up and have a backup running.
  • Easy and cost-effective licensing. I didn't need to count CPU's or VM's or other random facts to work out my licensing. Just how many hosts, and then one of 3 feature levels of which two have unlimited VM licensing. Hosts x Feature Set = Cost.
  • Easy Restores. Backing up is one thing, but restoring and having confidence in the restore is another. It just works, simple and effective.
  • Help is easy to find if you need it. From within the app, it gives you options of email, phone, and live chat, which is usually available even with odd time zones in play.
Read full review
  • Replicate data for Dev/QA
  • Easy setup/upgrade
  • Support is easily reachable
Read full review
Cons
  • More cloud-based storage options. Currently, only Azure is supported, which is excellent, but it would be good to have AWS and Google storage options too.
  • It would be AWESOME if they could do a restore from Azure cloud direct to an Azure VM instance. Currently, you need to set up an Azure VM machine with nested Hyper-V, install Altaro on that, and then restore into a nested VM, this gets crazy expensive.
  • Better notification of errors, or more around having a threshold, so if it misses one backup of a constant backup that happens every 5 minutes but recovers at the 10 minutes back, it is ok. Just think it needs to identify significant or long-running issues better than the occasional little issues.
Read full review
  • Documentation: There are some areas where the documentation is weak or dated. In particular, running SharePlex on RAC is a more involved process than the implementation guides would have you believe. When reaching out for assistance, the answer from Dell (a few years ago) was to engage their consulting team.
  • Built in scripts/agents: SharePlex comes with a handful of monitoring and management scripts that can be run as cron jobs. Unfortunately, these scripts are primitive and rigid, requiring the user to hard-code values into the script body and limiting their usefulness when you're running multiple replication streams. Some of the methods and dependencies are heavy. We ended up writing custom scripts that do what we need but it would be helpful if there were greater functionality and flexibility out of the box.
  • Compared to other tools, there is not as wide (or at least as active) a user presence. If you're having difficulties you may have to engage a consultant since it's less likely that you'll find an answer in a forum or blog post.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It simply works and it is making our lives easier. The renewal process is also really good
Read full review
We depend on it to supply data to our various OLTP and Data Warehouse environments
Read full review
Usability
A lot of people in the technical industry deliver what I would call snack crackle pop topics, where the software gets over complicated, and they drown people in all the "fancy" features. Altaro, from my point of view" has designed the software to be super usable, easy to implement, as well as support. It is really one of the best designs
Read full review
It is very usable once you get over the initial setup.
Read full review
Support Rating
One of the most important benefits of the Altaro HyperV backup solution is the support. From the free edition, you're able to chat with the support that can assist you in a remote session an find a quick solution that solves the issue. It is always available. The email support is also.
Read full review
Support is very responsive. They take ownership of the problems and see them through to the finish. When a bug is found they work towards developing testing and making the fix available to us to solve the problem.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Altaro has really designed their product so well that you can honestly implement this within a couple of minutes
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The only other competitor I am personally familiar with is Carbonite. I use that for file-level backups throughout my network and it works well but while it does offer backups for virtual machines, I have never found it to be a reliable option. Jobs failed for me regularly for no apparent reason. In the handful of times I have needed support, they were helpful and straight-forward.
Read full review
SharePlex was a clear winner in comparison to its competitors. It beats GoldenGate on price, providing equivalent features and performance at a fraction of the price and without the need to license costly Oracle features at the database level. DB Visit was a strong contender for us as well and it is an excellent product I would also recommend, but it did not have quite enough of a user and community presence and penetration for our management to feel comfortable with.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Restoring our primary ERP VM has already saved many hours of rebuilding from data backups, so that in itself already gave us an excellent ROI for having Altaro running.
  • The quick and easy setup also makes sense for a fast ROI as we didn't need to spend much time or effort in its set up.
  • Lastly, any other restores we have done for retrieving files or testing backups were so simple and easy to do that the process didn't take long and saved us time and cost.
Read full review
  • Data migration allows the company to make solid business changes, more so on new business plans.
  • Further, system flexibility supports multiple business plans, hence, efficient and reliable.
  • Finally, real-time decisions are arrived at using SharePlex, a procedure that ensures there is transparency in the entire operations.
Read full review
ScreenShots