HPE Nimble Storage vs. IBM SAN48B-5

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HPE Nimble Storage
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Nimble Storage was acquired by HPE in 2017. The enterprise flash array product line now goes by the name HPE Nimble Storage.N/A
IBM SAN48B-5
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM's SAN48B-5 is a SAN option.N/A
Pricing
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Features
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
HPE Nimble Storage
8.7
12 Ratings
3% below category average
IBM SAN48B-5
-
Ratings
Flash Array Performance8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Flash Array Integration10.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Compression10.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades10.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Simplicity9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Power Savings5.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 8.3 out of 10
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Dell VMAX
Dell VMAX
Score 9.7 out of 10
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(28 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HPE Nimble StorageIBM SAN48B-5
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
HPE Nimble Hybrid storage is very cost effective that can provide the same Latency, I/O and Bandwidth compared with any other All FLASH storage which is 3 times expensive than this. From a feature comparison standpoint of view, there isn't much difference between Hybrid Vs ALL Flash. HPE Nimble Storage uses ALL Flash disk at the front end to process the data thus by reducing the cost by using a regular SAS disk at the back end. Its the software and the algorithm that HPE Nimble StorageE uses to achieve this. having said that, the overall data reduction, de-duplication and compression is above the mark as what the sales team promised initially. Overall, the storage is performing well without any challenges.
Read full review
IBM
In my experience with this equipment we have installed it for clients with different characteristics, in manufacturing companies with the configuration between their virtual environment and storage, in clients with storage in different sites making communication and data transfer between them, also in clients with SAP HANA where servers from different platforms and storage communicate
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • HP Nimble is basically an all in one SAN with SSD cache or in some cases fully SSD based however the thing it does the best is its front end GUI and user management capability making it easy for anyone to ramp up on managing it quickly.
  • The Nimble SAN is also very easily managed when it comes to hardware management. Outside of some major internal parts such as the mainboard, almost everything in the system is duplicated so single failures never bring the system down. Power supplies and drives are easily swapped out.
  • Nimble has incredibly capable and easily accessible support that is available 24/7.
  • The price point on Nimble, though higher than piecing together a home made SAN out of spare Windows Servers, is perfect even for some SMB's.
Read full review
IBM
  • The ease of configuration
  • Ease of administration
  • Growth according to usage needs
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • I'd like the GUI to include more information for some of the features such as replication data totals each night. You have to go to the command line for this.
  • It would be nice to have a feature built into the GUI that would show you the command line equivalent to get the same results you are seeing in the GUI.
  • Although the intial setup was easy, they could always improve on that portion. During my setup, I did have to do a lot of back and forth with research on their site as to what each setting was that I was setting up. They could have provided some sort of description for each field within the setup that would have made it easier to know what they were having us set up.
Read full review
IBM
  • the graphical administration interface
  • the help of options and/or parameters of the commands that is broader
  • Make software and firmware updates more user-friendly
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Nimble is doing its job well and any issues that do come up cause the Nimble support team to alert us before we would potentially see an impact to our production environment. I do wish we could expand into the unused space in the CS210 shelf which is limited by what I assume is a marketing/sales strategy, but we will likely add shelves moving forward.
Read full review
IBM
for being a product, reliable, safe and easy to use
Read full review
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Almost perfect, some hoops to jump through after major upgrade, but overall simple and effective. Our storage administrator really likes the integration with vmware as it makes his life easier. Also it was no trouble integrating it with our active directory credentials. The only issue we had was getting the plugin in VMWare going initially.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Any time I have had to contact support, they have always been quick to respond, and very efficient in resolving any issues. When an action has been required on our side for a fix, they have been very helpful in explaining step by step what was required, and when replacement parts have been needed, we've had them within 24 hours.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
We used a Dell EqualLogic PS Series storage array for many years and it worked well. A big issue was that upgrading firmware required system downtime and during one upgrade I was unable to bring the systems back up afterwards. I spent several days on the phone over a holiday weekend with Dell and VMware support in order to get my systems back up and running. It made me very nervous about doing firmware upgrades after that.
Read full review
IBM
This equipment model was selected for the characteristics it has which perfectly covered the functionality requirement in the implementations that were carried out, also for the ease of installation, configuration, administration and growth that it has. Customers have been satisfied with all the benefits of the equipment and above all that it is not necessary to invest too much time in its administration, since once implemented nothing else has to be done and the maintenance time used is the minimum since it is a very reliable and safe team
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • 100% uptime 4 years and counting in a 24/7 environment.
  • Long hardware support lifecycle, with extremely affordable maintenance renewal plans that provide real value.
  • Nimble has been the most cost-effective SAN solution I have ever deployed.
  • The inital costs, ongoing maintenance, and administration requirements were all 50% less than EMC and NetApp.
Read full review
IBM
  • installation and configuration in less time, that makes it more economical
  • Easier administration
  • The support given is minimal, which makes the staff carry out other productive activities.
Read full review
ScreenShots