What users are saying about
3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 100
43 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Visual Studio Test Professional is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

7.0

HttpMaster

70%
1 Rating
8.4

Visual Studio Test Professional

84%
15 Ratings

Usability

HttpMaster

N/A
0 Ratings
8.5

Visual Studio Test Professional

85%
10 Ratings

Support Rating

HttpMaster

N/A
0 Ratings
8.7

Visual Studio Test Professional

87%
12 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Borvid

If you're looking for a tool for building and running integration tests for API apps or other website/web services, HttpMaster is the way to go. A nice feature it offers is a free version, so you can see if it'll suit your needs before paying for it. An instance where it may not be the best option is if you're needing to build and run security tests, or requirements-based testing.
Read full review

Microsoft

Visual Studio Test Professional is best for .NET and C# based development, which is what 90% of our developers and projects do. It is an integral part of the CI/CD pipeline for our custom made Enterprise resource planning tool. It also works very well with Azure providing seamless integration to way more functionality.
Read full review

Pros

Borvid

  • Automated RESTful service testing.
  • Automated API app testing.
  • Automated website testing.
  • Parallel Execution.
Read full review

Microsoft

  • Visual Studio Test Professional when paired with Azure DevOps is the best solution for Test Case Management when compared to other Testing tools we've used in the past.
  • Test Results and Artifacts are always available with full traceablility for audits.
  • Testing and Release Management are tied together as one continuous pipeline.
Read full review

Cons

Borvid

  • Introductory tutorials/examples/training.
  • MacOS support.
  • Json formatting support.
Read full review

Microsoft

  • The user community of the Visual Studio Test product is weak. For instant problems with this product, it is necessary to quickly reach the source of the error.
  • Licence fees need to be more reasonable. License prices need to be reduced so that they can easily compete with free testing tools.
Read full review

Pricing Details

HttpMaster

Starting Price

$0 per user

Editions & Modules

HttpMaster editions and modules pricing
EditionModules
Express01
Professional992

Footnotes

  1. per user
  2. per user

Offerings

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

No setup fee

Additional Details

Lifetime license is available for Professional Edition.

Visual Studio Test Professional

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

Visual Studio Test Professional editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Usability

    Borvid

    No answers on this topic

    Microsoft

    Visual Studio Test Professional usability could be described as on the same level as other Visual Studio platform products. One very nice thing is the fact that usability aspects are improved with each new release. One example would be the test case navigation, which has been improved by introducing the keyboard shortcuts.
    Read full review

    Support Rating

    Borvid

    No answers on this topic

    Microsoft

    Visual Studio Test Professional is backed up by the full support of the Microsoft Corporation. That means twenty-four/seven customer support by quality, highly-trained professionals who understand every possible issue that you have experienced before. They are nice, efficient, and highly professional. I recommend them.
    Read full review

    Alternatives Considered

    Borvid

    Other honorable mentions are Paw, Insomnia Rest Client, and HTTPie. The reason we selected HttpMaster was primarily due to its ease-of-use. It's a very easy tool to set up, it has a nice UI, it offers a free version for trial purposes, and, similar to other tools, it can do all the testing we need for our applications.
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    The visual Studio Test tool is faster than other tools. Since the development and testing processes are in one tool, it is more profitable in terms of cost. It is more inconvenient to write a test case in DevOps.
    Read full review

    Return on Investment

    Borvid

    • Increased efficiency -- from ease of use.
    • Increased reliability -- from more thorough tests.
    • Automated test suites.
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    • One of the positive ROIs of Visual Studios is the fact that it makes producing our work at a quick rate, things like Intellisense make our work get produced at a much higher rate which is good for our return of investment.
    • Testing by the developers has increased by 23%, we now take the time to actually test our product before we send it to our QA people.
    • I am not aware of any negative ROI aspects to our company that have been found.
    Read full review

    Screenshots

    Add comparison