Likelihood to Recommend If an organisation has more access to data and have access to high end computers like GPUs it’s recommended to use Hugging face as it will give better accuracy than any other models. If an organisation having less data and has less access to GPUsis looking for decent performance then traditional algorithms are more appropriate than hugging face
Read full review - Don't want to pay
Tableau $1,000 / seat? Use Streamlit - Want fully custom views and navigation? Use Streamlit - Want access to Machine Learning and not just your dev team? Use Streamlit - Want to keep things internal and secure? Use Streamlit - Want your Data Science team to be able to crank out projects quickly? Use Streamlit - Sick of Jupyter Notebooks and Business Leaders not understanding them? Use Streamlit Our D.S. strategy has moved completely to delivering pages in Streamlit. I can hand an executive a Jupyter notebook and it'll get lost in translation. I can give them sign-in access to a page and they can answer all of their own "What-If?" questions! We've used Streamlit to productize our Data Science and Machine Learning capabilities.
Read full review Pros Model APIs Hugging Face Spaces for deploying demo apps Latest updated models available easily Vast support for language parsing and other relevant tasks Read full review Incredibly Easy Customizable Quick and powerful Read full review Cons Most of the Hugging face models are of big size, hence difficult to work if there is no access to high computational system like GPU. It’s good to have some visualization tool in hugging face for viewing model architecture. I recommend to implement hugging face lite version so that it can run on any system with less specifications. Read full review Recent Security issues (they quickly released an update to combat this though...) Requires a bit of HTML knowledge to really customize. If you're going quick, you don't need HTML though. Streamlit commands will pump your page out fast. Read full review Alternatives Considered There are some other services offer similar capacity as to Hugging Face, but not entirely the same. For example, amazon web services have a machine learning service called Comprehend, which offer a set of easy to use APIs to do machine translation and entity recognition and some other common NLP use case.
Read full review I started using Streamlit when it first came out and thought it was really useful and powerful. A few years later and they've really hit their stride! The features / widgets / materials they provide have been well researched, well designed, and well implemented. I will take Streamlit to any future companies I go to as well as be a strong promoter wherever I'm currently at. It's free. It's easy to use. It is really powerful. Sure? You could go pay for a larger system but your Data Science team should be able to handle Streamlit easily. I'd argue a non-technical person spending a few weeks in python could pick up Streamlit really quickly.
Read full review Return on Investment Hugging Face is cost and time saving. Pay is less, you pay what you use, doesn't affect much. Overall positive impact on business. Read full review I've scaled my team 2x since using Streamlit. We show off actual results that users can play with We're building a customer facing page that we're going to monetize. Incredible amounts of visibility into my team and what we're accomplishing. Read full review ScreenShots