IBM Cloud Container Registry vs. NGINX Ingress Controller

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Container Registry
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Container Registry enables users to store and distribute container images, and run them in the IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service and other runtime environments.N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
NGINX Ingress Controller is a traffic management solution for cloud‑native apps in Kubernetes and containerized environments.N/A
Pricing
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Features
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Container Registry
-
Ratings
NGINX Ingress Controller
7.8
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
7.9
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Container RegistryNGINX Ingress Controller
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
When I need to do a proof of concept of a solution for a client and it must have high levels of privacy and at the same time performance, I use IBM Cloud Container Registry.
Read full review
F5
Best suited if we have to manage external traffic inside your Kubernetes cluster and want to use granular control to your applications.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Scalable Plans
  • Easily integrate it with IBM Kube service
  • Easy integration with IBM Cloud CI/CD tools.
Read full review
F5
  • Provide access to containers
  • Manage traffic
  • Route traffic
  • Lightweight
  • Near to zero downtime
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Kubernetes
  • CI/CD
  • Docker
Read full review
F5
  • Its not related to Ingress functionality but certificate management with cloud vendor would be a feature i would like to see.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Not Applicable in our case. We started using IBM container registry as IBM bluemix is our preferred cloud platform
Read full review
F5
We are already using NGINX which is so reliable, it definitely lends weight to our decision to select NGINX Ingress Controller. Also, even though it is a little more complex to manage, NGINX Ingress Controller definitely have a richer feature set, better performance, caching, traffic management among other features which was why it was chosen.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • reliability
  • easy integration
  • multicloud
Read full review
F5
  • Security is one of the best objective which we achieve with NGINX Ingress
  • Cost optimization is one of the business objective
Read full review
ScreenShots