IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery vs. monday dev

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery, available on IBM Cloud, allows users to provision an integrated toolchain using customizable, shareable templates with tools from IBM, third parties and open source. Automate builds and tests with Tekton-based delivery pipelines, and control quality with analytics.
$0
monday dev
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
monday dev is a product to plan, track, and ship software while staying connected to the business, featuring AI capabilities that allow it to analyze bugs as they are submitted, summarize product documents, and automatically assign tasks.
$12
per month per seat
Pricing
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Editions & Modules
Lite
$0.00
Professional
$35.00
Authorized user per month
Basic
$12
per month per seat
Standard
$14.5
per month per seat
Pro
$25
per month per seat
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPlans start at 3 seats. Yearly save 18%
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Considered Both Products
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Its better than them
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Best fit for IBM Cloud and IBM Hybrid cloud strategy. Very well suited for RedHat Openshift and cloud-native build packs. Complementary solution for Enterprise Java workloads transformation and modernization journey such as java microservices development lifecycle and also …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud developer tools had good support for mobile and web based applications and seemed relatively easy to integrate to our applications. We have other IBM tools so it had a slight edge over others when we compared.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Google Cloud AI provides better speech-to-text integration for applications in which the word recognition ability is far good.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud Developer Tools stack up against Visual Studios and other integration suites, with an agnostic approach. IBM Cloud Developer tools integrate seamlessly with your existing stack to augment and accelerate data science and analytics projects at large. Tools are designed …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
This is recommended over other applications as it has a continuous delivery for non-mission critical applications also which has simple proof of concepts and this is reliable. Also, the integration to different platforms along with cloud implementation is an add-on. The ease of …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
IBM Cloud Developer Tools is way easier than Jenkins and most of the features Jenkins has are not useful for us and the features we wanted were absent ButIBM Cloud Developer Tools saved our lives and is perfect in all aspects as we can easily develop and deploy. The only thing …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Both competitors listed work in a similar manner; you can automate the deployment of servers using configuration files and the command line. The difference is that Ansible and Terraform are provider-agnostic, meaning you can use them for other hosting providers as well (AWS, …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Mainly, AWS offers 5G services which are futuristic. AWS has More products than IBM Cloud & it offers High Parallel Performance & Computing. Better global coverage than IBM Cloud & Rigid SLAs with credit compensation

Coming to Microsoft Azure, its user interface is very easy to …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Eclipse with IBM Cloud Foundry and Kubernets we used to develop application in on premises and deployed into the cloud. And we created containers, created many projects and deployed into the cloud by using Continuous Delivery in IBM Cloud. Great service and great support. IBM …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
There's not really a technical background on the decision of using IBM Cloud Continuous delivery. Our CTO assisted to a conference where IBM was promoting their services and offering a free tier. As in that instance the company was starting, every free tier offering was well …
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
CI/CD is much more user friendly than Jenkins.
It better integrates to IBM Cloud features.
On the other side, Jenkins deployed in a VM or better, on a K8S cluster is a less expensive solution.
Chose IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
I find IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery service way easier to set up compared to Travis CI. The visual interface helps you navigate throughout the service effortlessly. I used Travis CI 2 years ago, although it wasn't complicated, I took more time to create and set up an instance …
monday dev
Chose monday dev
Monday is better than Jobber, as it gives you a place to see where all the jobs are and what the current status is. Everyone in the company can go to and see that view. It's not dependent on the status of the employee. Excel is much more technical and requires much more work to …
Chose monday dev
It is at least as good as these tools, in many ways, it is better because it is easier to use and setup. It doesn't require a full-time admin like these tools do. It does lack some of the detailed reporting and such that these offer, but the product is still young and growing. …
Chose monday dev
We selected it because of our previous positive experience with monday dev. In addition, it gave us more options to tie in other parts of our business so it’s under one umbrella and then further automate things. The over tracking and monitoring ability is far better than others …
Chose monday dev
I think that overall the way that monday dev stands out among its competitors is the great design layout and also its ease of use. Most platforms have so many steps when editing a project or customizing its view, and when you work with monday dev, you are able to customize it …
Features
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
8.5
Ratings
13% above category average
monday dev
8.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Task Management8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resource Management8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.30 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Scheduling8.80 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.60 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Document Management8.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Email integration8.60 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Mobile Access8.70 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.70 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.60 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.30 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Search9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Visual planning tools9.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
monday dev
7.8
Ratings
0% above category average
DevOps Tool Integrations8.60 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Code Review7.40 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Code Collaboration7.70 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Velocity Calculation6.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers7.20 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Continuous Deliverymonday dev
Likelihood to Recommend
It provides a cloud-based integrated development environment that integrates with other IBM Cloud services to provide a streamlined development workflow. This includes real-time collaboration and code sharing capabilities, making it easy for teams to work together on projects. This feature is very useful for our app to maintain the code
Read full review
If you do web programming, code integration with your remote team, and/or software development that requires real-time monitoring of development progress, monday dev is an excellent tool for this. Like its base platform, Monday.com, monday dev is developed and attempts to integrate into a very "new era" organizational system of digital whiteboards, only now focused more on productivity and helping developers to be comfortable in remote work.
Read full review
Pros
  • It contains the deployment templates which are much more time saving and is of great use.
  • This has the integration of the Cloud applications which makes the work much more convenient.
  • This is flexible when it comes to development, deployment, and delivery.
  • [It] also has a much more reasonable pricing.
  • Provides space for the data storage.
  • [IBM Cloud Developer Tools] also can support many useful tools.
Read full review
  • Tracking
  • Changing Status
  • Backlog
Read full review
Cons
  • Its price is quite high and this made it unsuitable for us as we cannot afford such high rates.
  • Its Setup takes much longer time and this is frustrating.
  • Its interface needs to be improved and easy even for the Newbies.
Read full review
  • Sometimes, it's a little technical to set up. Someone who isn't particularly savvy will have a hard time setting it up.
  • Sometimes there are glitches in the automations.
  • The comments areas can be confusing- how they nest. Things can get lost in there.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It's a great platform to develop, run, test and deploy the applications easily. And it makes very easier and secure the implementation of continuous delivery process. For first time and experts also can use this service so easily. Great service provided by the IBM Cloud Continuous Service. There are more services that helps a lot to work on it. Thanks a lot.
Read full review
We are very likely to renew, because it has been really useful
Read full review
Usability
Nothing special to say : the UX is clear and simple.
Read full review
This has been one of the better software implementations and acquisitions that I have been a part of in the last 20 years. The ease of setup, use, and training make this a simple and quick tool to implement in any organization. The usability is so simple that the uptime to start using it is nearly 0.
Read full review
Support Rating
In more than a year using the IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery tool, I haven't had any major complaints or problems. However, in the last month, IBM suffered from a couple of problems through several of its services, and for a short period of time, I couldn't deploy successfully my projects. The problem was brief and was quickly fixed.
Read full review
Good engagement from account manager
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No I wasn't involved
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate with our current environment and applications
Read full review
Monday is better than Jobber, as it gives you a place to see where all the jobs are and what the current status is. Everyone in the company can go to and see that view. It's not dependent on the status of the employee. Excel is much more technical and requires much more work to set up.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • This has made the configuration files much easier to access.
  • Has made the commands more logical as well as easy for use and learning.
  • Contains great AI capabilities
  • The documentation needs improvement.
  • Error received from commands are pretty hard to understand.
Read full review
  • Although the initial operational cost is usually somewhat high, it is really worth considering in an environment with more than 10 employees working together.
  • In project costing (web development) it is quite acceptable and falls within the scope of the final product quote.
  • I don't have exact numbers or percentages (because I'm not in charge of that section) but I can say that it falls within a good to acceptable ROI range.
Read full review
ScreenShots