Likelihood to Recommend In terms of business challenges, it simplifies the job of my engineers and significantly increases the productivity of my teams when they collaborate with IBM teams all over the world. Now that we have completed a proof-of-concept using the services supplied by IBM, we expect it to assist us in managing them more efficiently; thus far, management has been straightforward.
Read full review OnApp CDN is great for virtually any site with a desire or requirement to offload processing resources to a content delivery network in general. The OnApp CDN is one of the largest, if not largest CDNs on the planet and is well equipped to handle virtually any type of file distribution, including video. Video distribution POPs on the OnApp CDN are less available because each host that offers video has special requirements they may or may not be willing to get involved with. If you plan to distribute video on OnApp CDN first check if the number of POPs available for serving video suit your needs
Read full review Pros Integration with IBM Cloud applications Easy to manage web application firewall Ease of protecting CloudFoundry applications Good console UI Protection for rare managed service offerings such as CouchDB through IBM Cloudant Read full review Ease of setup. You can be CDN enabled within a few minutes. Huge CDN network rivals any other out there. Competitive pricing due to web hosts who own OnApp CDN Edge Servers competing for traffic on their CDN POPs. Read full review Cons Request proxying is done by way of DNS name resolution, which is inflexible. Proxy services do not work on wildcard DNS entries. Read full review There really is nothing I can think of. It's simple and intuitive to use after your first instruction on the system. Read full review Usability I have seen faster and more user friendly interfaces like Azure
Read full review Alternatives Considered I have used
Salesforce to explore it as an app but I have found them both able to solve my needs and requirements when it comes to security. While I choose IBM Cloud Internet Services for more accessibility, a better price was available with Saleforce. Although that is just my observation.
Read full review We compared VMware for its virtualization capabilities and ended up deciding on OnApp as the UI was more intuitive for less technical support staff, which meant that our customers would have more staff available to help them with cloud related issues. We also checked our
Akamai specifically for CDN however again the OnApp platform seemed simpler and less expensive to leverage, and with the added benefit that we had more control of the CDN 'in-house' than using a fully third party platform
Read full review Return on Investment It had a positive impact with a big improvement on the performance of web applications. Services are quite fast to implement and easy to maintain from an IT perspective. Read full review OnApp in general has been a good investment, though in the early days this was a questionable result as stability was nothing like what it is today. Things have gotten much better over the years and I would anticipate OnApp to generate ROI so long as customers are looking for cloud and CDN solutions in general. I'm not sure that investing in OnApp as a hosting provider specifically for the CDN capability will generate any positive return, but the OnApp system as a whole has the features required that most should be able to make a return on. Read full review ScreenShots