IBM Confluent vs. Oracle Integration (OIC)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Confluent | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Confluent helps enterprises stream, connect, process, govern and serve real-time data across hybrid environments. | $385 per month |
Oracle Integration (OIC) | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | The Oracle Integration Cloud Service is an iPaaS providing prebuilt integration flows between applications, including other Oracle products. The Integration Cloud Service is scaled for enterprises, with prebuilt codeless adapters for on-premises and SaaS systems and low-code automation capabilities. | N/A |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Integration (OIC) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Integration (OIC) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Would buy again 24 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 12 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Implementation went as expected 18 Answers | |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Integration (OIC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Data Integration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Integration (OIC) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | Make Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon SNS Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM App Connect Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Google Cloud Pub/Sub Score8.8 out of 10 | Workato Score9.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Integration (OIC) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 8.3 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| IBM Confluent | Oracle Integration (OIC) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Oracle Integration (OIC) Screenshots |






