IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities. | N/A |
![]() Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used to provide intelligent detection and control of sensitive information across Office 365, OneDrive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and on the endpoint. It also helps prevent data loss through identifying and preventing risky or inappropriate sharing, transfer, or use of sensitive data on endpoints, apps, and services. | N/A |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | ![]() No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 22 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 19 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Happy with the feature set 22 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 80% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 16 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 87% Implementation went as expected 20 Answers | |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data Source Connection |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Data Transformations |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Data Modeling |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Data Governance |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Data Preparation |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Skyvia Score10 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Informatica PowerCenter (legacy) Score9.3 out of 10 | Forcepoint DLP Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SolarWinds Task Factory Score8.3 out of 10 | Forcepoint DLP Score8.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.0 | - |
| Usability | - | 7.6 |
| IBM InfoSphere Information Server | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| ![]()
|
| Pros |
| ![]()
|
| Cons |
| ![]()
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| ![]() No answers on this topic |
| Usability | No answers on this topic | ![]()
|
| Alternatives Considered |
| ![]()
|
| Return on Investment |
| ![]()
|
| ScreenShots | Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Screenshots |










