IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing vs. Smarsh

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM InfoSphere Optim
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere® Optim™ solutions manage data from requirements to retirement, to improve governance across applications, databases and platforms by managing data properly, enabling organizations to support business goals with less risk.N/A
Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Oracle offers the Autonomous Transaction Processing, supporting database self-repair and maintenance with machine learning to eliminate human labor, human error, and manual tuning.
$1.34
OCPU Per Hour
Smarsh
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
The Smarsh Enterprise Platform is a unified, cloud-native solution designed to future-proof enterprise communications data strategies. Its technologies include elastic compute, natural language processing, machine learning and artificial intelligence.N/A
Pricing
IBM InfoSphere OptimOracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingSmarsh
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Transaction Processing
$1.34
OCPU Per Hour
Exadata Storage
$118.40
Per Terabyte Per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM InfoSphere OptimOracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingSmarsh
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM InfoSphere OptimOracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingSmarsh
Best Alternatives
IBM InfoSphere OptimOracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingSmarsh
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.4 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM InfoSphere OptimOracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingSmarsh
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM InfoSphere OptimOracle Autonomous Transaction ProcessingSmarsh
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Optim is especially recommended for those companies that have their own or third-party development teams that must be provided with a complete data environment to test the applications. Optim is not recommended for use as an ETL or Data Integration tool.
Read full review
Oracle
If your company's value is not increased by maintaining databases, you should use the ATP.
Read full review
Smarsh
This appliance is well suited for organizations that have a need to monitor, moderate, or log social networking site use or the use of any website. It is a very solid tool for any information security department to have at their disposal.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Easily extract data from production environments with no-coding
  • Intelligent filtering capabilities using physical or logical relationships.
  • Advanced data masking funtions
Read full review
Oracle
  • Quick and simple to deploy (less than 5 steps to create a new instance)
  • No administrative tasks (backup, re-sizing) required
Read full review
Smarsh
  • Discovery: It allows for easy discoveries by the compliance and cyber security departments.
  • Ethical walls: This keeps certain departments from talking to each other.
  • Very granular control. This is a big product meaning you can get very detailed with it.
  • Once it's configured and running, we hardly ever have any issues.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Poor UI
  • Complex architecture
Read full review
Oracle
  • Connectivity between ATP and Oracle Kuberentes Engine cluster seems to drop randomly
  • The ATP could come in an even smaller shape as the smallest shape is already quite big . But if must be more than always free, as that version does have connectivity limitations about 20 connections
Read full review
Smarsh
  • Its configuration options were very large and required a good deal of time to learn all of the various settings.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Smarsh
It's the only product at this time that meets all of our requirements.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
You get almost all the features of Oracle Database, including the ability to deploy APEX applications, without having to worry about system, storage or database configuration and maintenance, backups, etc. Also, you can start for free and move up adding resources as you need.
Read full review
Smarsh
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Both Azure SQL Database and Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing offer a powerful and robust database platform. The advantage of Autonomous Transaction Processing is the ability to host APEX applications for free and without any special/complicated deployment or configuration process. Having a rapid development environment embedded for free was the main advantage for choosing Oracle as my cloud database provider.
Read full review
Smarsh
This was the only appliance of its kind that I have used. Other devices have different capabilities for web filtering such as the checkpoint firewalls, but none of them offered the overall solution that was deployed with this product at that time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Optim can save companies a lot of money by protecting the sensitive data found in their databases, thus avoiding the theft of real customer information with the economic and media impact that this has.
  • Accelerate the generation of non-productive environments saving time from human resources.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Approx 100 times faster spin up than manual setup of an Oracle DB
  • 3h annual maintenance for big version releases (18c to 19c) compared to est. 500h annual maintenance with manual database updates
Read full review
Smarsh
  • Faster investigative work has led to increased employee efficiency when working on security investigations.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing Screenshots

Screenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database takes automatic backupsScreenshot of Provisioning a new Autonomous Transaction Processing is simpleScreenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database  ConsoleScreenshot of Auto scaling and manual scaling options of the database