TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Integration Bus vs. Oracle WebLogic Server vs. TIBCO ActiveSpaces

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Integration Bus

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AIBM Integration Bus, replacing the former WebSphere Message Broker, is used to connect applications together, regardless of the message formats or protocols that they support. This connectivity helps to ensure diverse applications can interact and exchange data with other applications in a flexible, dynamic, and extensible infrastructure.N/A

    Oracle WebLogic Server

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/AOracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A

    TIBCO ActiveSpaces

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AActiveSpaces from TIBCO supports an application infrastructure.N/A
    Pricing
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Cloud Software Group
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    78%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    83%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of IBM Integration Bus and Oracle WebLogic Server and TIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Feature
    IBM Integration Bus
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle WebLogic Server
    7.2
    37 Ratings
    10% below category average
    TIBCO ActiveSpaces
    -
    Ratings
    IDE support00 Ratings9.033 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security management00 Ratings8.435 Ratings00 Ratings
    Administration and management00 Ratings5.837 Ratings00 Ratings
    Application server performance00 Ratings8.836 Ratings00 Ratings
    Installation00 Ratings5.637 Ratings00 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings5.525 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Mule ESB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    AWS Auto Scaling
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM DataPower Gateway
    Score9.5 out of 10
    NGINX
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling
    Score8.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.2
    (44 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM Integration BusOracle WebLogic ServerTIBCO ActiveSpaces
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    Routing, protocol transformation, message transformation and service aggregation are very well performed by WebSphere Message Broker (WMB). It is not very suitable for integration with databases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    TIBCO ActiveSpaces is useful for storing in memory data which enables fetching data quickly and efficiently. We can make use of TIBCO ActiveSpaces APIs for storing and retrieving data. In our organization, we store user session details in TIBCO ActiveSpaces and this session detail is used for authentication and authorizing user. We have integration TIBCO ActiveSpaces with React UI and TIBCO Business Works.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Graphical data mapper
    • Support for different programming languages
    • Integration with MQ
    • Support for different parsers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
    • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
    • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    • Like all other IMDG solutions, Tibco ActiveSpaces provides a scalable and distributed cache solution, which is supposed to have high throughput and high availability.
    • As it is under the Tibco umbrella, it is seamlessly integrated with other Tibco products.
    • It breaks the traditional "local cache" boundary and limitation, instead unifies many "local physical memory" to create one huge "In-Memory Data Grid", and serves the data provider/consumer application logically as one "Memory Cloud."
    • A lot of non-frequently updated data can be cached in this IMDG, to allow fast access, which saves the I/O latency caused by many traditional file system-backed storage solutions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Logging
    • Debugging
    • Code quality tools
    • Feature specific installation
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
    • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
    • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    • ActiveSpaces 3.2 is not compatible with the latest version of TIBCO Business Event 5.x. And ActiveSpaces 2.x is not compatible with ActiveSpaces 3.x hence there is a big difference in the BusinessEvents supported version of AS and the latest.
    • ActiveSpaces takes more disc space and TIBCO does not offer data compression logic out of the box. Developers need to do extra coding to use java snippets to compress and decompress the payload. Although the data compression gives must better performance and speed to the system.
    • The compression and decompression API are not offered by TIBCO out of the box, which is a shame. These are so easy and simple to implement, still TIBCOdoes not provide them as an option out of the box.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    TIBCO ActiveSpaces is easy to install and integrate with other product suites. It is easy to understand and implement as well. TIBCO ActiveSpaces supports multiple databases for storing the data(we are using Oracle Database). All the master data related to the users is being stored using TIBCO ActiveSpaces which keeps the data in memory and help to retrieve it quickly. It has helped to prevent concurrent login sessions by the same user as session details are stored in TIBCO ActiveSpaces and we override the existing user session with the new session details.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    Websphere message broker supports a lot more protocols than any other similar tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    Actually, we are gradually replacing the Tibco ActiveSpaces with Redis (for caching purpose only) or Hazelcast (for embedded mode and also for in-memory distributed computation purpose + in-memory distributed IPC purpose).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • It helped us in improving the speed to market for our services/APIs.
    • Learning curve is quite long
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
    • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cloud Software Group
    • Developers with basic knowledge of TIBCO and general data knowledge can easily design and develop an ActiveSpaces based cached solution. As the ActiveSpaces concepts are very simple and easy to understand.
    • Some business areas can predict the high influx of a service usage during a certain period. Business will be highly rewarded if they can identify these business areas and provide a cached solution using TIBCO AS.
    • Again, this is not a TIBCO ActiveSpaces only advantage and this is true for any/all caching products.
    • Some examples for the previous points are
    • a. telecom company pre-loading (eager load) customer's usage for the last month, right before releasing/issuing the bills to the customers.
    • b. Airline industry loading the customer's itinerary a week before his travel start date. Hence the last minute scrambling to fetch the customer's itinerary travel plans can be avoided.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots