TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM MQ

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AIBM MQ (formerly WebSphere MQ and MQSeries) is messaging middleware.N/A

    Jedox

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AJedox is a Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management solution. According to the vendor, their solution’s unified planning, analysis and reporting empowers decision makers from finance, sales, purchasing and marketing. Additionally, the vendor says this solution helps business users work smarter, streamline business collaboration, and make insight-based decisions with confidence. The vendor also says 1,900 organizations in 127 countries are using Jedox for real-time planning…N/A
    Pricing
    IBM MQJedox
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM MQJedox
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM MQJedox
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Jedox AG
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    32 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    39 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM MQJedox
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    8.3
    3 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    5.6
    3 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings5.93 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings5.53 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.63 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    8.8
    3 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    7.4
    3 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Mobile Application00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    8.4
    4 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.5
    3 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.3
    4 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.7
    4 Ratings
    25% above category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of IBM MQ and Jedox
    Feature
    IBM MQ
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.0
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Flat file integration00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM MQJedox
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Apache Kafka
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM MQJedox
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (48 ratings)
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    9.5
    (29 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.1
    (27 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (7 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (7 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM MQJedox
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    In the context of Internet of Things (IoT) applications, IBM MQ plays a pivotal role in managing the substantial data streams emanating from interconnected devices. Its primary function is to guarantee the dependable transmission and processing of data, catering to a diverse range of IoT use cases, including but not limited to smart city initiatives, healthcare monitoring systems, and industrial automation solutions. In the telecommunications sector, IBM MQ is employed for message routing, call detail record (CDR) processing, and network management to ensure real-time data exchange and fault tolerance. When managing the supply chain and logistics, IBM MQ is used to ensure timely and accurate communication between different entities, including suppliers, warehouses, and transportation providers. IBM MQ can be cost-prohibitive for smaller organizations due to licensing and maintenance costs. In such cases, open-source or lightweight messaging solutions may be more appropriate. For scenarios requiring extremely low-latency, real-time data exchange, and high throughput, other messaging technologies, like Apache Kafka, may be more suitable due to their specialized design for such use cases.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Best suited for financial consolidation and / or as a highly customized and compact EPM / BI solution (up to 100 CCU) with individual workflows, planning and reporting functionalities, with moderate number of users (no restrictions for any industry, all industries are covered well). It also has advanced reporting & data analysis requirements and provides an integration and reporting layer of imported data from different external systems (via ETL). It can help with migrating your legacy Excel-based business models to the Web. It is not well suited for Enterprise BI applications with expecting >500 CCU (users at the same time working with the system) - this may cause serious performance issues, as all data is kept in RAM. Jedox is also less suited for applications with heavy document management requirements (document management is not an out of the box functionality in Jedox and rather requires custom development through custom widgets etc.).
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • The documentation is very clear,It is understandable and the support helps to configure it in the best way.
    • Server guidelines make it possible to get the most out of work management. It's broad, we can work with different operating systems, I really recommend using linux.
    • It is highly compatible with systems, brockers, applications, and data accumulation programs, it is possible to configure everything so that after the installation of programs, they can communicate with each other and then throw data to an external program that accumulates it and represents in clear details of steps to follow and make business decisions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    • Using the Excel add-in means that our team was almost instantly productive, being able to use a familiar interface to present and manipulate data.
    • Allows us to quickly do analysis and comparison of current and historic data.
    • Really good to produce meaningful management reporting that can be adapted responsively to business requirements.
    • Implementing Jedox in our budget cycle dramatically reduced the time and complexity of the process, while making it more transparent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • There is limitation on number of svrconn connections you can have to MQ on the mainframe which has been an major issue for us. This has been an issue for us for over 4 years and still no fix although I am aware IBM have been working on a solution over the last year.
    • When upgrading to MQ V9.3 on our MQ appliances there is no fall-back option. This was the same for MQ V9.2 upgrade from MQ V9.0. For production upgrades this I believe is not acceptable.
    • AMS is not supplied as part of the standard mainframe MQ licence. You need an extra licence. IBM tell customers how important security and protecting data is yet they still want to charge for this software. The cost of MQ on the mainframe is not cheap so I would expect AMS to be part of the base product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    • Diversity. Jedox can be applied to many different use cases from small to large deployments and from budgeting to enterprise class BI solutions. But rarely is one tool able to fulfill all of these requirements in one organisation. This value proposition can be complicated for prospective users.
    • Awareness. Jedox punches above its weight in capability and scalability, but not enough people have heard about it and therefore procurement processes can be drawn out as a result.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    For a period of 5 years all our customers using Jedox have renewed their licenses.
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    I give it a nine because it has significantly improved my team's data reliability and operational efficiency. Its great security features give us peace of mind, knowing our sensitive data is well protected. While the setup might initially be complex, I believe the long-term benefits far outweigh this hurdle.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    To me Jedox deserves 10/10 because it is a consistent one-in-all platform with a modern look and feel. It is intuitive to use and allows you to make intuitive applications integrating traditional business intelligence with performance management functionality. It certainly has a short
    learning curve, especially for those that are familiar with MS Excel. An example: I've lost count but Jedox it is available in more than 25 languages. Another: Jedox does not require programming skills... it is developed to be used by the business.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    The messages are delivered instantly with this software and it integrates with our technology stack, in terms of availability we only had one failure when we were doing some testing and integration with third parties, the features of this software make it always available and its deployment is easy for the company, it does not generate expenses due to failures
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Jedox has
    very few bugs. Reports are available through an Excel add-in, the web and/or
    mobile device (IOS/Android). In my opinion, availability also means high
    performance, not having to wait for the system to give you the required reports,
    analysis, dashboards instantly.
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    Jedox is the fastest OLAP tool on the market. It can use GPU cards to increase performance even more
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    There are very specific things that must be elevated to more specialized areas of support, but the common support is very agile when receiving questions or when we leave concerns in real time. I recommend the support of the program in this regard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Jedox support in general is a professional and fast responding team. An easy-to-use ticketing system is in place. Bug-related questions are solved fast (responses come usually in a few hours after the question), but some questions / tickets, that are not Jedox-related bugs (for example some advanced questions about Jedox functionality), may be forwarded to Application Management team for further processing and then it may take several days or even weeks to get a response here -> there is room for improvement here.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    The implementation of SSO, SAML Authentication, HTTPS, Server splitting (Frontend / Backend servers) could be more standardized and made more user friendly to set up (e.g. via setup guide). Otherwise the implementation of Jedox is quick and simple when compared to other similar technologies.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    We found IBM MQ very easy to get started and quick to learn by the new users with a short learning curve and seamlessly integrates with IBM products, and quick to perform self-service analytics and make informed business decisions. IBM MQ is also very straightforward in creating simple and best reports, which are very profitable and productive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Calumo is similar product to Jedox. I have used it extensively in my previous role. It was a major contender when we evaluated a BI platform for NIDA. Calumo is a great product as well and it was a very close call. Where we found Jedox to be a better fit for NIDA was the ability to prepare dynamic reports with ease without the need to learn MDX which was used extensively by Calumo to make dynamic reports which expand or shrink based on the underlying data. Another major benefit we saw in Jedox was the whole ETL process could be managed within Jedox instead of doing it in SQL server which negates having a dedicated SQL specialist role when the scale expands.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    Scalability is often another word for speed. Given enough data, enough users or enough calculations, the tool becomes slower and slower. You will find that Jedox has a very high performance that can even be increased by the use of grafical cards. Other thaen that it does not only offer BI (looking back based on historical ERP data) but also allows you to look forward through integrated budgetting, planning, forecasting, workflow and collaboration. Not easy to find a tool that can support so much business functionality. So, also pretty scalable in that respect.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Positive- Message Reliability and Reduced downtime, increases the ROI many times.
    • Positive- Increased stability and enhanced customer experience
    • Negative- cost is very high - Both licensing and integration cost
    • Negative- Learning and training cost of IBM MQ is high as its complex to use and integrate
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    • Financial budgeting and Forecasting are done in a centralized fashion in Jedox now instead of a decentralized excel based approach. A lot of cost savings and improved reliability
    • Easy to use self-help Dashboards and detailed reports
    • Web-based reporting instead of excel based
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Jedox Screenshots

    Screenshot of Management Dashboard with Google Maps WidgetScreenshot of ABC Analysis (Procurement)Screenshot of Executive Sales ReviewScreenshot of Finance DashboardScreenshot of Sales DashboardScreenshot of Start