IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks vs. Juniper Contrail Networking

As service providers in Information technology, IBM Networking Services for Software Defined Networks has been of priceless value in management of virtual networks. It is crucial to improve our flexibility in administration of networks regardless of the usage bandwidth whether around the company or on our clients' networks. If you are looking to improve agility and configuration of your networks, then IBM would be the best SDN for that.

Incentivized

Best for: - Data Center Networking - NFVI Cloud Networking - Virtual Private Cloud for CSP

Incentivized

• Network evaluation
• Network performance

Incentivized

• Contrail Networking automates network resource.
• Providing reliability and agility while extending visibility into your multi-cloud network.
• Advanced analytics capabilities.

• It should have a standard API for inter plane connections.
• Centralized controller is ineffective.

• Contrail should have inbuild management of underlay network as well
• lack of open resources to learn

Incentivized

IBM is a company that has a lot of experience in networking services, in addition to having a better integration with other products of the same brand, for this reason we use IBM Networking Services

Incentivized

The platforms are very similar in networking concepts, at the interface level I found it easier to use Juniper Contrail than Cisco ACI. And at the cost level, I think it is cheaper.

• Loosening from the hardware constraints in network provisioning.
• We are top performing in Network modernization.

Incentivized

• Core of our NFV Cloud providing Multitenant Services
• Give Agility to our Cloud
• Wrokload any IP, anywhere

Incentivized