IBM Power Virtual Server vs. VMware Cloud on AWS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Power Virtual Server
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM presents their Power Systems Virtual Server as a scalable, cost-effective way to run IBM AIX, IBM i and Linux workloads​.N/A
VMware Cloud on AWS
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud on AWS provides the VMware SDDC software stack to the highly scalable AWS Cloud, including vSphere, vSAN, NSX, and vCenter Server. Each SDDC consists of 3 to 16 hosts, each with 36 cores, 512 GiB of memory, and 15.2TB of raw NVMe storage. The vendor states users can deploy a fully configured VMware SDDC Cluster in under a few hours, and scale host capacity up and down in minutes.N/A
Pricing
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
IBM Power Virtual Server
8.5
188 Ratings
5% above category average
VMware Cloud on AWS
-
Ratings
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime8.8187 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic scaling8.4186 Ratings00 Ratings
Elastic load balancing8.3183 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-configured templates7.9182 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring tools9.1185 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-defined machine images8.5183 Ratings00 Ratings
Operating system support8.5185 Ratings00 Ratings
Security controls8.8184 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation8.0161 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Small Businesses
Linode
Linode
Score 9.0 out of 10
Linode
Linode
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
SAP on IBM Cloud
SAP on IBM Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(188 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
2.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Power Virtual ServerVMware Cloud on AWS
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Due to its reliability, it is well-suited for mission-critical applications. It is also well suited for running multiple applications on a single server and fully utilizing the server's full capacity. However, it is not well suited for servers that require dedicated IO resources.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Pros
IBM
  • It is easy to segregate test environment with production environment
  • security and compliance
  • IBM server are scalable with - with increase in data it can dynamically allocate the resources with saves the company cost
  • it is very convenient to use with help of its hardware management console and integrated virtualization manager.
  • The best part it , it support our legacy system.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Cons
IBM
  • Having a wider selection of software to work with would be welcome.
  • Training and education is daunting at first and could be simplified.
  • Much of the automation is wonderful after it is set up but getting started has a steep learning curve.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
At the moment we are 100% satisfied with the performance and our support team is well used to the process involved. So unless we have some major issues in adopting, we are sure to be with IBM itself.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
Power Systems Virtual Server on IBM Cloud for IBMi's overall usability is good, but it can be difficult for new users, some learning is needed, but there are tonns of online documentation.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
IBM
Very easy to use.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
Easy to use.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
As with most IBM products the ongoing support for IBM Power Virtual Server is solid and consistent. IBM provides a clear roadmap for receiving support of their products. Both voice and online response is offered. It is obvious that IBM has the internal systems and culture to maintain support functions. This starts from the initial support call to the problem analysis and continues through the problem resolution. Documentation and communication are consistent within this process.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
It is economic.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
They both have their own ups and downs and it totally depends on the team which suits them best. IBM Power Virtual Server has Performance, Scalability, Reliability and Availability, Compatibility, and Good Vendor Support. The specific use case and workload requirements played a significant role. Some workloads may benefit from IBM Power Systems' architecture, while others may perform equally well on alternative platforms.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Scalability
IBM
It is efficient.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • We have had a return on investment of 30%.
  • There have also been 80% fewer application crashes due to a lack of resources that previously ran on the X86 platform.
  • Administration management has been simplified and staff can dedicate themselves to the development of applications, instead of providing support to users when the applications do not respond efficiently, this made staff 45% more productive.
Read full review
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots