TrustRadius

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM DevOps Test UI
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI and data-driven testing. IBM DevOps Test UI is an automated functional and regression testing tool for GUI and data-driven testing. It supports a range of applications, including web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, and PowerBuilder.N/A
SoapUI Open Source
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
IBM DevOps Test UISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM DevOps Test UISoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM DevOps Test UISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
IBM DevOps Test UISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.0 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source
Score 7.9 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM DevOps Test UISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM DevOps Test UISoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM Rational Functional Tester is good for automating thick applications.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
SmartBear
Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • An execution log in html format provides detailed information of the actions, verifications, and screenshots with timestamps.
  • Quick response and good support. IBM releases frequent updates to handle customer needs and fix issues.
  • A solid object inspector, extensive functional library and playback monitor.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Ease of implementation
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly interface
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Installation or updates were not always perfect. Would have to clean previous installations or reinstall Java if there were errors.
  • No or very limited support of browsers outside of Internet Explorer.
  • Uses a lot of memory, can have memory issues on large tests.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
SmartBear
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Abraham García | TrustRadius Reviewer
Abraham García
Web Development Manager
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Selenium is similar to IBM Rational Functional Tester but is not as user friendly and does not support thick applications. Visual Studio Coded UI is newer so not as refined; the object inspector/management and execution log results is poor compared to IBM Rational Functional Tester.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
SmartBear
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
JD
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Speeds up and broadens the testing cycle by using machine time for regression testing.
  • Frees up time for testers to focus on critical items outside the automated suite.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Ajay Kumar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ajay Kumar
Software Developer
Read full review
ScreenShots