IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.N/A
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management (formerly ServiceNow IT Business Management) is a solution built on the Now Platform and designed to allow users to gain visibility into portfolio investments and business strategies for better outcomes.N/A
Pricing
IBM Engineering Lifecycle ManagementServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Engineering Lifecycle ManagementServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Engineering Lifecycle ManagementServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Best Alternatives
IBM Engineering Lifecycle ManagementServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
monday.com
monday.com
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Engineering Lifecycle ManagementServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend
3.0
(22 ratings)
8.1
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
4.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Engineering Lifecycle ManagementServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
The software is robust enough to handle highly complex software development or other product development and can be used well beyond the range to do what a client needs. However, because of the inability to hold its users to proper best practices, things can get wildly out of hand and cascade over the years, creating unnecessary technical debt. The system has a lot of usable features, but they don't funnel users toward the correct processes and practices.
Read full review
ServiceNow
Monthly planning cycle: Business Stakeholders submit their feature requests and ideas, IT experts assess them and add Effort Estimation IT management set sprint SOW with the Business stakeholders Resources are planned, requested, and allocated. The job is done, change management process is conducted including weekly CAB meetings (Change Advisory Board). The change is deployed and documented.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Open Services supporting Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC).
  • Required definition management and managed capabilities enabling.
  • Rational DOORS Web Access for local on the test field presence.
  • On-sites established reporting system.
  • Approved linking requirements to test plans
  • Engineering Requirements Management DOORS traces requirements thereby eliminates manually processes and spreadsheets, for improved productivity.
  • Returns the investment efficiently.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Creating Requests
  • Knowledge base article
  • Hassle free UI
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • I feel like it is too heavy sometimes and updating is not very straight forward. For example, if I want to change an incident ticket (IN) to a service request (SR) and add some comment for the change, I have to first change the IN to SR, then click refresh which takes a few seconds, then add a comment. If I forget the refresh step, my comment will be discarded without warning like my ticket is not in the latest status. This also happens when somebody else changes the ticket during my edit as I can not lock the ticket exclusively.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • New UI is bad. Transition is not liked by users
  • Notifications can be improved. The mail notifications are little off
  • Category changes are not supposed to be hard
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
At the moment we are required by contract to continue to use the IBM DOORS software for our current client. Given that it can be expensive, if we were to use it after our current client's needs were met, we would have to secure other projects in order to justify the continued use of the software.
Read full review
ServiceNow
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
The UI is terrible and not intuitive. Users need training in order to complete tasks. Much like SAP, it's not the clearest tool. The tracing feature is especially complicated because you must write the scripts yourself. There is a learning curve. Also, even the setup, installation, and logging in each time takes a considerable amount of time.
Read full review
ServiceNow
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
It does a basic job and has the potential to complete some robust reporting tasks, however, it really is a clunky piece of software with a terrible user interface that makes using it routinely quite unpleasant. Many of our legacy and maintenance projects still use DOORS but our department and company use many alternatives and are looking for better tools.
Read full review
ServiceNow
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
No problems
Read full review
ServiceNow
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
It was easier to do all the change management-related activities, even configurations were handled very effectively. New process definitions and initiatives made it easier for better project deliverables. Effective resource allocations and better reporting and defect management. The overall cost of the tool is great too and well within budget.
Read full review
ServiceNow
Salesforce Appex Microfocus ITOM and related
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • It's part of CLM suite so it can be used to manage the whole lifecycle with tight integration with development module (Rational Team Concert) and quality module (Rational Quality Manager).
  • Comprehensive reports and dashboards provide better visibility.
  • License cost is on higher side.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Best ITSM tool
  • Clean UI
  • Deployment is easy
Read full review
ScreenShots