IBM SevOne vs. Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued)
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM SevOne | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | IBM SevOne’s app-centric, hybrid network observability empowers NetOps teams with ML-driven insights, enabling proactive issue prevention and resolution. With a single source of truth for network performance, it delivers visibility to optimize operations and support agility in complex, multi-cloud environments. | N/A |
Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | Red Hat Virtualization (formerly Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, broadly known as RHEV) is an enterprise level server and desktop virtualization solution. Red Hat Virtualization also contains the functionality of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization for Desktop in later editions of the platform. | $999 Per Year Per Hypervisor |
| IBM SevOne | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | IBM® SevOne® uses Managed Device (MD) and Managed Client Device (MCD) as pricing metrics. These can be mapped to managed devices for physical, virtualized and containerized functions in the managed environment. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 15 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| IBM SevOne | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Server Virtualization |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM SevOne | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 | Proxmox VE Score9.2 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 | VMware vSOM (discontinued) Score10 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 | ![]() IBM PowerVM Score9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM SevOne | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.7 | 6.6 |
| IBM SevOne | Red Hat Virtualization (discontinued) | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM SevOne Screenshots |








