IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. IBM Watson Visual Recognition (discontinued)

It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.

Incentivized

As I mentioned before, it can only be employed in simple basic visual recognition applications. It can be employed in large projects and relying it on completely is not encouraged. It's better to create your own algorithms rather than using it. If you are from a non-programming background, then I may suggest you rely on this and use it to develop simple apps that can predict a few plants and animals.

Incentivized

• Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
• SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
• Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
• Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.

Incentivized

• Food recognition
• High reliability
• Speed

Incentivized

• The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
• It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
• It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection

Incentivized

• Not perfect
• Accuracy is doubted and sometimes it may not predict correctly.
• I think it should be improved and should add a few more functionalities.

Incentivized

because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)

Incentivized

The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface

Incentivized

I am giving this rating on the basis of its usability in real-time applications and based on the interface to upload negative and positive images to train the AI. But it's not perfect and sometimes its predictions are wrong. On overall usability, it's better if you are planning on working with UI rather than using complex programs and algorithms on your own.

Incentivized

From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected

Incentivized

Never had slow response even on our very busy network

Incentivized

I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path

Incentivized

The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching

Incentivized

The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests

Incentivized

It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view

Incentivized

The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.

Incentivized

It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost

Incentivized

• Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
• Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
• Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks

Incentivized

• High cost if models are trained

Incentivized