IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data vs. Keras

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Watson Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Keras
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Keras is a Python deep learning libraryN/A
Pricing
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataKeras
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Watson StudioKeras
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataKeras
Features
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataKeras
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
3% below category average
Keras
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
18% above category average
Keras
-
Ratings
Visualization10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
16% above category average
Keras
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
12% above category average
Keras
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Keras
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls7.022 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataKeras
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.6 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataKeras
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(65 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.6
(2 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Availability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for DataKeras
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Open Source
Keras is quite perfect, if the aim is to build the standard Deep Learning model, and materialize it to serve the real business use case, while it is not suitable if the purpose is for research and a lot of non-standard try out and customization are required, in that case either directly goes to low level TensorFlow API or Pytorch
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Open Source
  • One of the reason to use Keras is that it is easy to use. Implementing neural network is very easy in this, with just one line of code we can add one layer in the neural network with all it's configurations.
  • It provides lot of inbuilt thing like cov2d, conv2D, maxPooling layers. So it makes fast development as you don't need to write everything on your own. It comes with lot of data processing libraries in it like one hot encoder which also makes your development easy and fast.
  • It also provides functionality to develop models on mobile device.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Open Source
  • As it is a kind of wrapper library it won't allow you to modify everything of its backend
  • Unlike other deep learning libraries, it lacks a pre-defined trained model to use
  • Errors thrown are not always very useful for debugging. Sometimes it is difficult to know the root cause just with the logs
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Open Source
I am giving this rating depending on my experience so far with Keras, I didn't face any issue far. I would like to recommend it to the new developers.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
Open Source
Keras have really good support along with the strong community over the internet. So in case you stuck, It won't so hard to get out from it.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Open Source
Keras is good to develop deep learning models. As compared to TensorFlow, it's easy to write code in Keras. You have more power with TensorFlow but also have a high error rate because you have to configure everything by your own. And as compared to MATLAB, I will always prefer Keras as it is easy and powerful as well.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
Open Source
  • Easy and faster way to develop neural network.
  • It would be much better if it is available in Java.
  • It doesn't allow you to modify the internal things.
Read full review
ScreenShots