TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM watsonx.ai

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AWatsonx.ai is part of the IBM watsonx platform that brings together new generative AI capabilities, powered by foundation models, and traditional machine learning into a studio spanning the AI lifecycle. Watsonx.ai can be used to train, validate, tune, and deploy generative AI, foundation models, and machine learning capabilities, and build AI applications with less time and data.

    $0

    Keras

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AKeras is a Python deep learning libraryN/A
    Pricing
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    Editions & Modules
    Free Trial
    $0
    ML functionality (20 CUH limit /month); Inferencing (50,000 tokens / month)
    Standard
    $1,050
    Monthly tier fee; additional usage based fees
    Essentials
    Contact Sales
    Usage based fees
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPricing for watsonx.ai includes: model inference per 1000 tokens and ML tools and ML runtimes based on capacity unit hours.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    98%
    Would buy again
    45 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    36 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    46 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    30 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    33 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    AI Development
    Comparison of AI Development features of IBM watsonx.ai and Keras
    Feature
    IBM watsonx.ai
    6.6
    2 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Keras
    -
    Ratings
    Machine learning frameworks6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data management6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data monitoring and version control5.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated model training6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Managed scaling7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model deployment6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security and compliance7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    Small Businesses
    Saturn Cloud
    Score7.8 out of 10
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    DataRobot
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    DataRobot
    Score8.2 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (36 ratings)
    8.1
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (6 ratings)
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM watsonx.aiKeras
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    I have built a code accelerator tool for one of the IBM product implementation. Although there was a heavy lifting at the start to train the model on specifics of the packaged solution library and ways of working; the efficacy of the model is astounding. Having said that, watsonx.ai is very well suited for customer service automation, healthcare data analytics, financial fraud detection, and sentiment analysis kind of projects. The Watsonx.ai look and feel is little confusing but I understand over a period of time , it will improve dramatically as well. I do feel that Watsonx.ai has certain limitations from cross-platform deployment flexibility. If an organization is deeply invested in a multi-cloud environment, Watson's integration on other cloud platforms may not be seamless comported to other AI platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras is quite perfect, if the aim is to build the standard Deep Learning model, and materialize it to serve the real business use case, while it is not suitable if the purpose is for research and a lot of non-standard try out and customization are required, in that case either directly goes to low level TensorFlow API or Pytorch
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • It allows specialists to apply several base models for specific subtasks in the field of NLP.
    • Gives the availability of many models developed for AI enhancement for different solutions.
    • Has incorporated functionality for data governance and security to support access to AI tools by multiple users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • One of the reason to use Keras is that it is easy to use. Implementing neural network is very easy in this, with just one line of code we can add one layer in the neural network with all it's configurations.
    • It provides lot of inbuilt thing like cov2d, conv2D, maxPooling layers. So it makes fast development as you don't need to write everything on your own. It comes with lot of data processing libraries in it like one hot encoder which also makes your development easy and fast.
    • It also provides functionality to develop models on mobile device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • IBM watsonx.ai is expensive than other platforms.
    • Limited integraions though it has many but still some tools integrations not there for medical usecase
    • Its little difficult to learn as right now not many open reseouces
    • Community is not that strong to get any answer
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • As it is a kind of wrapper library it won't allow you to modify everything of its backend
    • Unlike other deep learning libraries, it lacks a pre-defined trained model to use
    • Errors thrown are not always very useful for debugging. Sometimes it is difficult to know the root cause just with the logs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    I still don't have enough experience, but i have seen a lot of demos and i have made some real world scenarios and so far so long every thing looks fine. I was at IBM Think 2025 and IBM TechXchange 2025 and the labs were really usefull and simple to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    I needed some time to understand the different parts of the web UI. It was slightly overwhelming in the beginning. However, after some time, it made sense, and I like the UI now. In terms of functionality, there are many useful features that make your life easy, like jumping to a section and giving me a deployment space to deploy my models easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    I am giving this rating depending on my experience so far with Keras, I didn't face any issue far. I would like to recommend it to the new developers.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    I still don't have enough experience, but i have seen a lot of demos and i have made some real world scenarios and so far so long every thing looks fine. I was at IBM Think 2025 and IBM TechXchange 2025 and the labs were really usefull and simple to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras have really good support along with the strong community over the internet. So in case you stuck, It won't so hard to get out from it.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    IBM watsonx.ai has been far superior to that of Chat GPT AI. the UI elements prompt responses and overall execution of the AI was much better and more accurate compared to the competition. I can not recommend using this platform enough. Great job IBM. I hope the team behind this project continues to grow and prosper.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Keras is good to develop deep learning models. As compared to TensorFlow, it's easy to write code in Keras. You have more power with TensorFlow but also have a high error rate because you have to configure everything by your own. And as compared to MATLAB, I will always prefer Keras as it is easy and powerful as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    IBM
    I still don't have enough experience, but i have seen a lot of demos and i have made some real world scenarios and so far so long every thing looks fine. I was at IBM Think 2025 and IBM TechXchange 2025 and the labs were really usefull and simple to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Time saving to set up the infrastructure - without watsonx.ai we would have had to set up everything individually
    • The first point translates directly into cost savings
    • The compliance aspect was a game changer for us and provided us with the confidence to focus all our efforts only on IBM watsonx.ai
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Easy and faster way to develop neural network.
    • It would be much better if it is available in Java.
    • It doesn't allow you to modify the internal things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM watsonx.ai Screenshots

    Screenshot of the foundation models available in watsonx.ai. Clients have access to IBM selected open source models from Hugging Face, as well as other third-party models, and a family of IBM-developed foundation models of different sizes and architectures.Screenshot of the Prompt Lab in watsonx.ai, where AI builders can work with foundation models and build prompts using prompt engineering techniques in watsonx.ai to support a range of Natural Language Processing (NLP) type tasks.Screenshot of the Tuning Studio in watsonx.ai, where AI builders can tune foundation models with labeled data for better performance and accuracy.Screenshot of the data science toolkit in watsonx.ai where AI builders can build machine learning models automatically with model training, development, visual modeling, and synthetic data generation.