Icinga vs. SolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Icinga
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Icinga is an open source network monitoring platform. It includes automation, modularized integration packages, and prebuilt alerts and reporting capabilities.N/A
SolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SolarWinds Web Performance Monitoring (WPM) is a website and SaaS application performance monitoring tool. It utilizes synthetic and real user monitoring for proactive issue detection and performance reporting. WPM is designed to be scalable with business needs.N/A
Pricing
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Features
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
SolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
10.0
1 Ratings
24% above category average
Remote monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multiple Server Monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
SolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
10.0
1 Ratings
25% above category average
Performance data reports00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Customizable reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Data visualization00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Icinga
-
Ratings
SolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
10.0
1 Ratings
39% above category average
Administrator access control00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Small Businesses
Veeam ONE
Veeam ONE
Score 8.6 out of 10
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 9.0 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(7 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IcingaSolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM)
Likelihood to Recommend
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a world-class monitoring system. It can be used for most general monitoring situations. It is not a silver bullet, however, and there are instances where domain-specific monitoring systems are necessary. However, the output from those monitoring systems can be funneled into Icinga as a central monitoring and alerting system.
Read full review
SolarWinds
We've found WPM to be a fit for every web application that we wanted to monitor. If you have a web app that you'd like monitoring/alerting for then WPM may work for you. So far our only struggles have been when after logging in the app launches a new tab.
Read full review
Pros
Icinga GmbH
  • Wealth of community-developed plugins.
  • Stable codebase.
  • Icinga 2 supports distributed monitoring.
  • Very performant, can support tens of thousands of checks per server.
Read full review
SolarWinds
  • Testing web applications
  • Ability to log in to secure sections of websites in order to test user authentication
  • Provides a detailed history of steps taken and provides print screens of each step. If an error occurs you can see the web page to better diagnose issues.
Read full review
Cons
Icinga GmbH
  • High learning curve, setting up Icinga from scratch can be a bit of a challenge starting out.
  • If the io2db process fails you UI stops updating, which can be very frustrating.
  • There is no simple mechanism for adding new hosts and services through the web UI, it's all very config-file based.
Read full review
SolarWinds
  • The recorder is clunky and must be run on a local machine.
  • It does not support frames.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is a solid solution which does everything it promises. It is backwards compatible with most Nagios instances, making the transition very easy. Once you get the hang of installing new plugins and editing configuration files expanding its monitoring capabilities are easy.
Read full review
SolarWinds
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Icinga GmbH
No answers on this topic
SolarWinds
Solarwinds support is top-notch, and while we rarely have to call them, they are always very helpful when we do.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Icinga GmbH
Icinga is better than Nagios because of its nicer user interface. New Relic can monitor CPU/memory and disk usage, but it's more of a performance and application troubleshooting tool rather than monitoring
Read full review
SolarWinds
At the time we purchased WPM we were not aware of alternatives and therefore did not compare them.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Icinga GmbH
  • With one check you know which applications are faulty e.g. after an upgrade. Which is big time saver
  • You easily detect outages ion the applications so that your customer ideally does not even realize there was an outage.
  • Detect if the environment does deliver the same result as in the same time as before to detect shortages.
  • Additional information when debugging. Saved us several hours where we could simply point to a database which was slow.
Read full review
SolarWinds
  • Better reporting of down states to allow for SLA reporting
  • Better alerting during certain failure conditions which allows the IT org to respond faster
  • More thorough history to review past errors and see screenshots of the errors.
Read full review
ScreenShots