IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Jenzabar SONIS
Score9.1 out of 10
N/A
Jenzabar now offers SONIS, a student information system (SIS) oriented around the needs of smaller higher education institutions. Jenzabar supports the former SONISWEB product since its acquisition of original developer RJM Systems in 2015.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Jenzabar SONIS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Jenzabar SONIS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
IFS Applications
Jenzabar SONIS
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
4.7
3 Ratings
46% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
14% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
9.9
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
8.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
6.3
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Pricing
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
3.9
4 Ratings
64% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
9.3
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
68% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
5.0
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
6.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
9.1
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
4.8
4 Ratings
42% below category average
Jenzabar SONIS
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Student and Faculty Administration
Comparison of Student and Faculty Administration features of IFS Applications and Jenzabar SONIS
Feature
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Jenzabar SONIS
8.8
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Integrations with 3rd-Party Education Technology
00 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
Online Registration Management
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
District Communications, such as messaging and alerting
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We often had students who came and took a class or completed a program, left, and then came back for something else at a later time. It was nice to be able to have someone in Jenzabar SONIS with multiple statuses. They could be in as a Student for the current class while still being in as an Alumni for the program they had graduated from. Most of our programs are set up so the students within that program are all taking the same courses at the same time. The bulk registration feature made it easy to enroll one student and then use that student's enrollment to quickly enroll all of the others in the program. That was a huge time saver. We had letters and emails that we wanted to send out at specific times in the application process. The Activity tool in Jenzabar SONIS made it easy for us to have some things that were automatically added to a person's record and others that we could add as needed. We could then run timed letters or emails and get our communication sent out. We had some challenges with Jenzabar SONIS because we have a number of certificate programs that are only one semester in length. We often had students who would complete one certificate (program) in the fall and then complete another one in the spring. Many of the reports pulled data only for the active enrollment so we had to go back and manually pull the data for the enrollment from the other semester if we needed something for the full school year.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SONIS sorts my advisees by class and then by name. This is NOT useful. There should be an option for sorting by name only. I advise almost fifty students. It wastes my time looking for them in the sophomore listing, then the junior listing......
When registration of a student for semester courses is complete, there should be an option to print out only the courses scheduled, NOT the entire page which shows available courses at the bottom.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's Easy to use and navigate through. It gets the job done for daily tasks. Sometimes it may require a small amount of manual work. You can handle student records, housing, and check-ins without needing multiple systems. After staff are trained, they can move through tasks pretty quickly, which saves lots of time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
We changed databases in 2011 because the company we were with was going to quit supporting our software. We evaluated a number of different SISs available at the time and felt Jenzabar SONIS provided the best tools for our school. Most of the others were either geared more for adult education, individual course offerings or for schools that primarily had degree-seeking students. We needed something that could address both needs.We felt Jenzabar SONIS did that best of the ones we reviewed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info