IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Moodle
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Moodle is an open source learning management system with hundreds of millions of users around the globe and translated into over 100 languages, used by organizations to support their education and training needs.
N/A
Pricing
IFS Applications
Moodle
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS Applications
Moodle
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS Applications
Moodle
Features
IFS Applications
Moodle
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.4
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
6.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
5.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
9.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.1
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Billing Management
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
9.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
8.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.4
2 Ratings
24% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
67% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
30% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
7.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.5
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
7.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
7.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.7
4 Ratings
10% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
22% above category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Forecasting
8.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
45% below category average
Moodle
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Moodle is great for any environment where a class or other learning activity needs to be completed in an asynchronous manner. It can be used to post information, create interactive threads for discussion, issue quiz and exam work with grading, track and grade progress, and keep track of attendance. It is an overall wonderful solution for managing asynchronous learning.
The interface is not very intuitive. You must know what you are looking for in order to navigate effectively.
Although installation of Moodle is easy, it is a little more difficult to configure it with your other Learning tools. As an example, LDAP synchronization is a little difficult.
The interface is a little dated, even though new releases keep coming out (which is great!) none of them really add value to the appearance of the platform.
We use it because it is what have committed to back in 2011. Perhaps Moodle will evolve and advance in a positive way that will alleviate most of our user-based gripes? Perhaps it will not appear to be as cost effective given the need for a certain level of engineering and support staff to maintain it at a future level of sustainability? It's hard to say. As an enterprise scale critical application, we like it, but don't love it. Our instructors don't particularly like it at all.
Moodle can be used on a tablet, on a mobile phone, and on a PC. It is easy to navigate for learners and figure out for administrators. The learners can easily complete tasks and the administrators can easily track completion. The last thing about Moodle that one may not realize is that it somewhat resembles Facebook in its layout. This means that users are already familiar with the interface and therefore they are more comfortable using it.
Yes, Moodle is always available. We are self-hosted and Moodle is always up and available. The only time that it is not available is when we are upgrading it each semester. It is then down for just a few planned hours. That is in-between semesters and we let the faculty and students know. We do it on a Friday evening and it is back up within a few hours.
Moodle is an excellent LMS in relationship to any other one that I have seen or used. The pages load quickly and the reports complete in a reasonable time frame. Moodle has taken on Respondus, StudyMate, BigBlueButton, Turning Tech, Turnitin2, Certificates, Attendance, Tegrity, Questionnaire, Virtual Programming Lab, and Badges. All of these programs work right in with Moodle and do not cause any issues. Instructors may also use Camtasia and Snagit software as well as using webcams, downloading videos from the Internet, adding into books, or any of the many other areas within Moodle. Our instructors use the grade books without many problems and really don't ask questions much anymore. We upgrade Moodle every semester and are currently on 2.9+. Our instructors have basically learned to use most of the resources and activities.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Moodle is open source, and must be evaluated in that context, but one also has to provide a fair comparison to competing products with commercial backing. Support varies depending on the component of Moodle. Bug reports in Moodle Core that affect security or stability are dealt with promptly. Functionality requests or features not working smoothly may or may not be addressed, depending on whether the functionality desired matches the "vision" of Moodle HQ. The user community provides excellent support for initial installation and configuration, but more complex questions may go unanswered, unless they are noticed by someone who happens to know the answer. The support forum feature at the Moodle site (the same feature used within Moodle itself) does not provide granular subscription to topic discussions, apparently by design, and Moodle HQ seems resistant to changing this feature.
Find a partner who will work with you during the implementation process. Be sure to provide ample training for veteran users on the changes and for newbies on the overall product.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Blackboard has clear advantages in rubric management, and offers a content management system of its own. The largest barrier is cost for smaller or financially-disadvantaged organizations. However, as in any IT project, adequate resources must be made for even "free" software.
Well, I administer Moodle for a dozen of our divisions and there is a wide range of flexibility between offerings. I have course instructors who use every module i their course, chock full of videos, pictures, links to web tools for synchronous sessions within the asynchronous course. I also have others who are content with a syllabus, a few pdfs, links to podcast lectures and a few simple assignments. No matter if your organization is big or small, or if your requirements are strict for credentialing or non-existent (for internal know-how), Moodle can accommodate you.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
While it certainly takes more time to develop an online training vs a face-to-face we can offer the same content over and over again and meet a larger audience. There's no way we could have offered these trainings face-to-face to the same size audience. Economically it's just not feasible. Moodle allows us to share multiple trainings on a variety of topics over extended periods of time in a cost effective way.
The impact on early interventionists is still being evaluated, but we do know that early interventionist now have more ways to access professional development than in the past. The ability to customize the registration page has allowed us to track which agencies in Virginia are having their staff participate and we can see which topics are favored above others.
Other LMS's were far too costly. Aside from the monthly hosting fees (less than $200 a year), and the time it took to do the initial install and setup, Moodle is free. Once it's setup the only elearning costs are related to the development and creation of each training and then the setup of training on Moodle. This allows us to devote more time and money to the development and creation of more courses vs. the management of the system.
Minimal tech support for the users is required and most requests are limited to lost/userid passwords. The course designer is able to manage tech support needs for the users because so few requests are received.