TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IFS Applications

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/AIFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A

    Polarion ALM

    Score10 out of 10
    N/APolarion ALM is an application requirement management software platform now owned and supported by Siemens since the 2015 acquisition. It is available on the cloud (Polarion X) and on-premise. Polarion connect teams and projects to improve application development processes with a single, unified solution for requirements, coding, testing and release.

    $42

    per month per user

    Pricing
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Polarion X Base
    $42
    per month per user
    Polarion ALM
    Contact Sales
    one or more years per user/concurrent
    Polarion Requirements
    Contact Sales
    one or more years per user/concurrent
    Polarion QA
    Contact Sales
    one or more years per user/concurrent
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Considered Both Products
    IFS
    No answer on this topic
    Siemens AG
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    16 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    20 Answers
    Features
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration7.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.7
    5 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins8.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.9
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.85 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    8.8
    5 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards8.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.5
    5 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    5 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking9.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry8.25 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold8.35 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.9
    4 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    2.7
    1 Ratings
    95% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    67% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Project Planning and Scheduling9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    3.5
    4 Ratings
    68% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Bids Analyzed and Compared9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Authoring8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Repository8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supplier Management9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    5.0
    4 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Risk Repository8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Management8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue Detection7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Transportation Planning and Optimization8.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management8.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Production Process Design9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Production Management9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration Management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Work Execution9.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    21% above category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Forecasting8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Planning9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of IFS Applications and Polarion ALM
    Feature
    IFS Applications
    4.8
    4 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Polarion ALM
    -
    Ratings
    Proposal Management8.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management8.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Small Businesses
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Zoho One
    Score9.1 out of 10
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    9.8
    (24 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    7.6
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IFS ApplicationsPolarion ALM
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IFS
    Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    The question is actually not trivial to answer in 200 words. To summarize, I can say that we have had consistently positive experiences with all customers where we have used Polarion ALM. The sector in which the customer operates only played a subordinate role. We use Polarion ALM in almost all sectors: Medical technology, pharmaceuticals, aerospace, agriculture, automotive and many others. It is also interesting to note that in the beginning we were mostly active in the development of products, systems or software. Over time, this has changed more and more for some customers and risk management or projects for lessons learned have taken up more space. This enabled us to banish a seemingly endless number of Excel lists. Who doesn't know this problem: at first there is only one Excel list on the drive. Day by day there are more. Some with a date in the file name. Others with an employee abbreviation. In the end, nobody can tell which is the current and complete list. The really good thing about Polarion ALM is that it is extremely flexible to use and the configuration determines what the project is used for in Polarion ALM. It is customizable to my situation and not rigid.
    Read full review
    Pros
    IFS
    • It supports the web version in most later versions.
    • It provides various mobile versions of the applications as mobile apps to cater various areas.
    • IFS Applications allows easy configurations of the application without going for costly customization.
    • It covers almost every areas of an industrial company so any other third party applications are minimum.
    • It allows safer and easier built-in options for integrations capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    • Requirements Management:
    • Polarion ALM provides a centralized repository for capturing and managing requirements. Teams can define, organize, and link requirements to other artifacts like test cases and development tasks.
    • Test Management:
    • Polarion ALM facilitates end-to-end test management. Teams can create detailed test cases, manage test execution, and track test results.
    • Traceability and Impact Analysis:
    • Polarion ALM ensures traceability across all phases of the development lifecycle. Users can establish links between requirements, test cases, development tasks, and other artifacts. This traceability helps in impact analysis, allowing teams to understand how changes in one area may affect other parts of the project.
    • Customization and Adaptability:
    • Polarion ALM is highly customizable to fit the unique needs of different organizations and industries. Users can create custom workflows, define custom fields, and adapt the tool to their specific development processes.
    Read full review
    Cons
    IFS
    • Handling massive volumes of data can be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    • More robust engine as far as the actual took is concerned. There are navigation components in trace to reporting which we feel can be improved especially when dealing with cross global accessing of the tool. It slows us down a bit so it's backend driven optimization as well as some front end "clunkiness" that can be improved.
    • Improve some filtering capabilities especially in creating custom reports and generally all around the ALM components of the tool.
    • As of the version we have, the ability to enhance replationship types in traceability is limited.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Siemens AG
    There is too much at stake to go into a new system. But with everything else being promised as far as newer more innovative products, the justification to not renew is a huge risk so that is not a concern
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    IFS
    The system is very difficult to use, overly complex, and difficult to learn. It also has limitations that are hard to overcome.
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    Polarion ALM can be used individually and what I do with Polarion ALM is decided by my configuration. Lesson-learned, operational risk management, product, system or software development or customer management .... doesn't matter at all. I decide with my configuration what I will do with Polarion ALM. Of course, you can also use Polarion ALM out-of-the-box for your development because it comes with a large set of project templates.For this reason, I would also recommend not to just get started. A suitable consultant will show you the right templates and customize them according to your needs. Having Polarion ALM is like having a car. You know exactly how to operate the car. You've done it a thousand times before. The details are in the configuration: did I have a navigation system installed or not? Do I have a lane departure warning system or not? Do I have cruise control or not? Unlike when buying a vehicle, almost all functions are already available and can be used, usually at no extra cost. However, if something is missing, it can be obtained via the manufacturer's extension portal. Individual extensions are subject to a charge. Polarion ALM - easy to deploy and easy to use.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Siemens AG
    update, reindex takes to long
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IFS
    We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    Support for customers using the full range of Polarion could be better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Siemens AG
    competent trainer, good training project
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Siemens AG
    easy to follow, efficent
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Siemens AG
    Automated install and backup procedure ist missing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IFS
    IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    Polarion ALM has the best usability, extensibility and reactiv product management. The support is also very good compared to other companies. Or in other words it is closer to the customer. Codebeamer is for sure also a good ALM tool with a great feature set, but existing customers are often neglected. We will see, what PTC as the new owner of codebeamer will change at this point.
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    IFS
    No answers on this topic
    Siemens AG
    should be more flexible
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IFS
    • Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
    • Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
    • Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Siemens AG
    • Many of our customers have achieved things that they could not have done without Polarion
    • Possibility to make engineering enjoyable and not so documentation oriented (especially in regulated industries)
    • Automatic and all the time up-to-date reporting gives savings in time
    • Information reuse is typically giving benefits in resource use and time-to-market. Up to 40% reduction in time-to-market seen.
    • 10-20% reduction in R&D cost is typically achievable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IFS Applications Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Polarion ALM Screenshots

    Screenshot of Requirements Management - This feature is used to gather, author, approve and manage requirements across the full project lifecycles.Screenshot of Test & Quality Management - From this interface, users can manage all testing activities from a central platform.Screenshot of Issue & Risk Management - This interface is used to track all possible and reported failures, or plan and assign tasks to mitigate them.Screenshot of Connectors & Extensibility - Out of the box integrations with popular tools. Free, open APIs can be used to build apps and extensionsScreenshot of Agile / Hybrid Project Management - Modern agile techniques can be adopted at once or incrementally with out of the box project templates that can be adjusted to meet any needs.Screenshot of Core Functionality - Collaboration, Traceability and Workflow - 3 core principles built into the software