Indusface Web Application Scanning vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus

I like to know what digital assets I have, where I have them and what the status is at any given time. detecting state changes in real-time is a critical security challenge. Traditional EDR/XDR products are not suitable for the intended purpose due to signature-based methodologies' inability to detect or prevent malicious activity. I like the presentation of the product, it's very effective and engaging. Not having to respond to countless false positives is worth it's weight in gold.

If you need to roll out security patches on a regular basis, like monthly, for example, it's perfect since users barely notice it, and we get full compliance. If you require 3rd-party software updates. It can be less appropriate if your environment relies mainly on Mac devices or if you need to patch critical servers.

• All the patches are tested before delivered to us.
• It's on cloud so we does not need to maintain Hardware and Network.
• It also upgrades the hardware drivers & BIOS. But for BIOS only we use monthly updates no automatic policy just push to target computers.

Incentivized

• If this tool can fetch serial numbers of the devices on which this is deployed
• This tool should collect all application installed at client machine which is not available as of now.
• Intergate more application which can be patch using this tool.

Incentivized

The overall usability for the application is great precisely for the ease of use the application provides, if i would go in a different organisation, i would suggest implementing ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus or Endpoint Central due to its features, and productivity.

Incentivized

The support team at Patch Manager Plus has been awesome. Very responsive and knowledgeable. There are times when there is confusion between different tickets but there is still good service.

Incentivized

The report you send the format and detailing the report , easily identify the vulnerability of the website, executive report is also the proper formatted it very useful

SolarWinds was not selected because it runs on top of
SCCM which in itself is problematic and unreliable. We need an application that
runs in standalone mode and does not rely on any other application. SolarWinds
is also one of the most expensive. Kaseya and GFI LanGuard are overkill as they contain
functionality that we do not need or already have. GFI LanGuard for instance
does security auditing the same as Qualys that we already have. Kaseya is a full
management and automation solution.

Incentivized

• ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus provides an excellent return on investment. We were able to get our systems fully patched, which we'd never been able to complete before. This provided excellent security to our organization.
• ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus saved us a lot of time as most of our patching was fully automated.
• ManageEngine took any issues we found and looked for solutions to further improve their product.

Incentivized